Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: purpleraine; Jim Robinson; AFA-Michigan; Abathar; Agitate; AliVeritas; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; ...
the owner forbids articles supporting the rights of and positive stories about homosexuals.

Has it escaped your attention that THIS article is supportive of homosexuals? When it was posted, FReeper markomalley put "MEGA-BARF ALERT" in parenthesis, but the agenda of the article was UNCHANGED. Free Republic does not allow articles from certain sources (this generally has more to do with the sources request than it does with FR) and some articles are pulled because Jim Robinson or the moderators do not feel that they are appropriate, but I am unaware of any general prohibition that you describe.

I would challenge you to find an article from the mainstream media about homosexuality that is not positive. The FACT is that the media has been pushing the homosexual agenda for decades and this is done in spite of the fact that it is an inherently depraved and dangerous lifestyle.

You are fairly new here and you say that your husband was banned, are you sure that you aren't on here pushing some leftist agenda?

Homosexual Agenda Ping

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.

Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.

Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.

138 posted on 07/09/2008 6:01:38 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]


To: wagglebee
Has it escaped your attention that believing someone can serve in the military and die for their country may not be "supportive" of them.

Don't quote the policy to me. I cited it earlier. I've been reading here since 1998. Your attempt to call the gendarmes is hiding behind the fact that you have no good argument.

If a political party has 20 planks in their platform and you agree with one or two of them, that does not mean you support the platform.

Challenging me to find that article has nothing to do with my position or the discussion here. It's fluff you have thrown in as if it has some relevance to make you're position less weak than it is.

When you respond to me, as I know you will, take your best shot. I don't like you or your style, so I won't come back at you.

145 posted on 07/09/2008 6:38:20 AM PDT by purpleraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson