Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: purpleraine
“I am not asking the army to support homosexuals. I am asking the army to leave them alone unless they violated some standard of conduct.”

Umm, in order for the military to not “leave” them alone they must support sodomy in the first place.

Hint, sodomy nor adultery goes big with most military personnel. You see, people's BEHAVIOR not skin color or genitals must be JUDGED in the strict environment of an all VOLUNTEER military.

Yes they are homosexuals in the military, as well as adulterers, pedophiles, liars, thieves ect... What is your point besides forcing the acceptance of behaviors deemed sick and perverted by many military members? "Human rights"? I guess those who deem homosexuality morally reprehensible have no rights?

87 posted on 07/08/2008 1:23:33 PM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: rollo tomasi
You logic is ill and nonsensical. Stealing and attacking kids is not analogous to homosexuality. Maybe in your mind, but not to normal people.

To leave homosexuals alone who are not assaulting or harassing others is not supporting sodomy. Since sodomy is not illegal in the US what is you proposed postion the military should take that is not already included in their code of conduct? Should they prohibit sodomy off-base or off-duty?

89 posted on 07/08/2008 5:07:09 PM PDT by purpleraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson