Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Maelstorm

no... McCain is on the wrong message...

Drill... Drill.... Drill.... that is the only message. God what a bad candidate.


2 posted on 07/14/2008 11:33:07 AM PDT by Chuzzlewit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Chuzzlewit
Drill... Drill.... Drill.... that is the only message.

You can't be serious. Only one issue? There are plenty of issues in the air for this election ... not just the price of (foreign) oil.

12 posted on 07/14/2008 11:47:29 AM PDT by al_c (Avoid the consequences of erudite vernacular utilized irrespective of necessity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Chuzzlewit

“Drill... Drill.... Drill.... that is the only message”

For now at least, short term. Then he’s got to get people thinking about `resource substitution’, e.g. when whale oil got scarce we switched to kerosene.
Now that oil’s dear, what—electric cars? Electric power from what—coal? No, nuclear power.
But he’d have to reach across the aisle to the Republicans....same with enforcing USC Title 8, and so forth and so on.


16 posted on 07/14/2008 11:54:59 AM PDT by tumblindice (But, but we can't do that...si, si se puede)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Chuzzlewit
Drill... Drill.... Drill.... that is the only message. God what a bad candidate.

Jeeze, your mantra sounds like a single issue democrat talking about electric cars. I ask them how they would plug in their Chevy Volt to charge up the batteries if they live on the 97th floor of an apartment building? Hmmmm? Easy, buy a long extension cord.

First, in itself, drilling for oil anywhere is not a total solution. Are 300,000,000 American cars and trucks supposed to stop by an oil field, uncoil a garden hose, and fill up their cars and trucks with crude?

Concurrent with drilling, there are pesky infrastructures (roads and pipelines) required to be built to transport crude from the wells to new refineries. Similar infrastructure is required to get refined product to distribution points for delivery to gas stations.

Then there is coal. Few mention coal because there is a perception that it is dirty, and it's also not as glamorous or popular an energy source as oil.

Nukes. Since the DOE is essentially worthless, they could do a one week energy study to determine, by state, nuclear kilowatt production to kilowatt consumption, and establish a benchmark for the states. If states failed to provide nuclear energy to its residents, they would lose a proportionate amount of Federal spending in that state. This puts the pressure on the States to be accountable for its electrical energy instead of outsourcing from neighboring states.

People need to look at energy from a total solution perspective, and think through the issues and solution resolutions instead of yelling and ranting DRILL, DRILL, DRILL !!!!

20 posted on 07/14/2008 12:13:30 PM PDT by Cobra64 (www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson