Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sender
Heh. To be worth building, such an expensive net of solar satellites would have to provide gigawatts of energy, which would require orbiting gigawatt radio transmitters, and they want to "safely" beam gigawatts of energy down to Earth and somehow collect all that and convert it to 60Hz. Nikola Tesla will be impressed if they can pull that off.

And people are worried about cell phone radiation?
This kind of scheme would really zap people near the earth receivers

The beam would end up kind of "wide" by the time it reached earth

50 posted on 07/24/2008 1:54:19 PM PDT by dennisw (That Muhammad was a charlatan. Islam is a hoax, an imperialistic ideology, disguised as religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: dennisw
It would not only be "wide" and zap people near the receivers, it is entirely impractical to implement. A "beam" of energy from upper space down through the dispersive atmosphere would end up covering several counties, so you really can't collect all that energy. Even if you could, it would be less than 50% efficient I'm sure. In other words, it's vaporware. It can't be done.

Add this idea to all the other alternative energy schemes proposed so far. We would have big orange extension cords sooner than this.

But to be fair, solar and wind power are not losers, they are good supplements for buildings and homes down here. They are not, however, good power sources for cars and trucks. Cars and trucks require oil, or else we are going to have to build a lot more coal and nuke power plants for electricity. I have to get to work 30 miles away.

52 posted on 07/24/2008 7:12:40 PM PDT by Sender (Never lose your ignorance; you can never regain it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: dennisw
Disclaimer: I inadvertently posted the forbidden scientific words "it can't be done". Of course it can be done, beaming some sort of hogwash down upon receivers on the Earth. We already have the Dish Network.

It cannot be done in a manner which imparts a net gain in energy and which is economically feasible to the citizens of the Earth.

There, fixed it.

53 posted on 07/24/2008 7:18:36 PM PDT by Sender (Never lose your ignorance; you can never regain it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: dennisw; Sender
The beam would end up kind of "wide" by the time it reached earth

If the constellation were a phased array, mutually coherent (easily implemented) each could beam at the same point on the earth, the interference pattern, i.e., the beamwidth of all of the elements would be proportional to the wavelength divided by the effective width of the constellation. Extremely small.

If one satellite failed the effect outside of the intended target area would be comparable what would be experienced if only that one satellite were radiating. A few million watts over an area the size New England would be a negligible health risk, microwatts per square meter. Each satellite could weakly modulate its signal to provide a health indication of the array with out substantially defocussing the beam. Current phased array radars with thousands of elements radiate periodically into a near field horn, modulating one phase shifter at a time to provide real time monitoring of the array status. It's like weighting a mosquito on an elephant, doable if you have a high enough SNR and weight your elephant often enough. The modulation waveform could be like a cell phone's CDMA waveform, a set of orthogonal signals, which can individually be picked out of the cacophony of competing signals.

57 posted on 07/25/2008 6:20:22 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (His Negritude has made his negritude the central theme of this campaign)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson