Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Raycpa

Actually they would not be Natural born but instead would be naturalized by birth.

Personally I have no problem with the fact that our founding fathers might have decided against giving the presidency to a bastard or the offspring of some immoral coupling, especially when one considers the effects some bastards had in European politics. They were men of Morality and faith by all accounts (even those that strayed).


110 posted on 08/09/2008 1:37:06 PM PDT by usmcobra (I sing Karaoke the way it was meant to be sung, drunk, badly and in Japanese)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]


To: usmcobra

You really truly buy into the absurd result that children born to an unwed mom under 21 are not citizens at birth?

Stop and look at what you are willing to accept just to hang onto this notion that O’Bama’s birth in Hawaii doesn’t make him a citizen.

Tell you what. At the risk of feeding you and other’s irrational conclusions on this matter, I will give you and them an argument that at least won’t be self contradicting and is arguable with the law and with logic.

Argue that Hawaii was never admitted properly as a state. The process is really messy and it requires acts by both governments and it should be easy to create doubt.

At least that argument can avoid creating pretzel logic like arguments that this author creates.


115 posted on 08/09/2008 1:51:12 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson