Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Raycpa
"If this is true, then every child born to an out of wedlock mother under the age of 21 (16+5) would not be a citizen at birth. ...."

Remember we are talking IF the child is born outside the U.S. But the subject of unwed mothers has been addressed in some other law.

David can you help here?

135 posted on 08/09/2008 2:36:10 PM PDT by Spunky (You are free to make choices, but not free from the consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]


To: Spunky
Remember we are talking IF the child is born outside the U.S. But the subject of unwed mothers has been addressed in some other law.

You are talking about if the child is born out of the US. The author and some on this thread are arguing this applies to anyone born in the US. That interpretation leads to the inevitable conclusion that millions of children every year need to line up at immigration in order to become citizens.

It is nonsensical.

As for the unwed mom's I brought that to David's attention because it limits the possible scenarios being thrown around. Basically, a child of an unwed mom has the same citizenship as the mom regardless of other qualifications. David can you help here?

137 posted on 08/09/2008 2:42:35 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson