Skip to comments.
Abortion has no Negative Psychological Consequences: American Psychological Association
LifeSiteNews ^
| 8/13/08
| Hilary White
Posted on 08/13/2008 3:49:21 PM PDT by wagglebee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 last
To: Future Snake Eater
I agree. These young girls are told it is just an "unviable tissue mass" and are not allowed to view pictures of a developing embryo. When they see these pictures later and realize that the "tissue mass" they were encouraged to abort had fingers, toes, a tiny nose and mouth, and the definite appearance of a baby, many are overcome with guilt. If they are blessed with more children later, they ask themselves how they ever could have destroyed something so precious.
That is why the pro-abortion crowd does not want candidates for abortion to be fully informed about fetal development or to have a 24-hour waiting period prior to the abortion. They know that most of them DO have a conscience and would reconsider if given the appropriate information and were allowed to think about it.
61
posted on
08/13/2008 6:28:19 PM PDT
by
srmorton
(Choose life!)
To: Coleus; nickcarraway; narses; Mr. Silverback; Canticle_of_Deborah; TenthAmendmentChampion; ...
Abortion is the Choice of Satan, the father of lies and a MURDERER from the beginning.
Pro-Life PING
Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.
62
posted on
08/13/2008 8:38:42 PM PDT
by
cpforlife.org
(A Catholic Respect Life Curriculum is available FREE at KnightsForLife.org)
To: Morgana
Feeling guilty? Take a pill!
Feeling sad? Take a pill!
Feeling anxious? Take a pill!
Feeling fearful? Take a pill!
Feeling stressed? Take a pill!
Feeling down? Take a pill!
Feeling _____? Take a pill!
63
posted on
08/13/2008 8:51:01 PM PDT
by
Manic_Episode
(Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps...)
To: wagglebee
64
posted on
08/14/2008 3:56:18 AM PDT
by
8mmMauser
(Jezu ufam tobie...Jesus I trust in Thee)
To: Golden Gate; Admin Moderator
Can Ad Mod edit the Title now? (Suggestions below...) This title should NOT be on the FR forum, giving people false info. (People may see the headline & not read the article.) Just a few thoughts:
1. Generally (at least in my experience) a "Barf Alert" is added when the CONTENT of an article is BS. This article clearly IS NOT.
2. The source of this article, LifeSiteNews, is 100% pro-life and I didn't see a point in altering the title.
3. We are not supposed to alter titles in the first place.
Some people don't like to change titles when they post, but if the article / study is bogus, it should be CLEARLY stated in the TITLE.
The study IS BOGUS and the article CLEARLY points it out.
65
posted on
08/14/2008 5:02:54 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
One big problem is the way the issue is framed.
If the study was honest and said, “Killing one’s baby by dismemberment,
has no Negative Psych Consequences,” rather than
discussing having a “procedure,” the result would be quite
different!
To: Lesforlife
67
posted on
08/14/2008 6:28:51 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
68
posted on
08/14/2008 6:35:01 AM PDT
by
Sopater
(A wise man's heart inclines him to the right, but a fool's heart to the left. ~ Ecc 10:2 (NASB))
To: Sopater
Of course it’s flawed! They already knew what they wanted the result to be, so I’m sure they just worked backwards from there to make the data fit their conclusion.
69
posted on
08/14/2008 6:38:14 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
70
posted on
08/14/2008 6:41:09 AM PDT
by
Sopater
(A wise man's heart inclines him to the right, but a fool's heart to the left. ~ Ecc 10:2 (NASB))
To: wagglebee
The babies would disagree, if they could.
71
posted on
08/14/2008 6:42:26 AM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: wagglebee
72
posted on
08/14/2008 11:31:09 AM PDT
by
Aquinasfan
(When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
To: Aquinasfan
And yet it’s not the least bit surprising.
73
posted on
08/14/2008 11:42:16 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
So the depression my daughter underwent following an abortion she was pressured into having by the man who got her pregnant was not real? BS.
74
posted on
08/14/2008 9:20:06 PM PDT
by
SoldierDad
(Proud Dad of a U.S. Army Soldier soon to be training other Army Soldiers)
To: muawiyah
Didn’t Kinsey pioneer that form of ‘scientific inquiry’?
75
posted on
08/14/2008 9:21:16 PM PDT
by
BelegStrongbow
(what part of 'mias gunaikos andra' do Episcopalians not understand?)
To: BelegStrongbow
Although Kinsey didn't invent the technique (the business of scam artistry having an ancient lineage) he certainly used it to excess.
He took up the topic of pedophilia and then went to a prison to interview a convicted pedophile.
76
posted on
08/15/2008 12:10:48 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
