Posted on 08/13/2008 3:49:21 PM PDT by wagglebee
August 13, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A report from the American Psychological Association (APA) published this week claims that there is no meaningful connection between abortion and subsequent psychological disturbances in women. When a woman has a negative psychological consequence, says the report, it is likely only to be in cases where a "wanted" child was aborted for eugenic reasons.
"Among adult women who have an unplanned pregnancy the relative risk of mental health problems is no greater if they have a single elective first-trimester abortion than if they deliver that pregnancy," the report says.
The study's conclusions dovetail neatly with the insistence of abortion industry lobbyists that the key issue in abortion is "wantedness." If a woman aborts an unwanted baby, the 90-page study says, the psychological consequences are negligible. It is when a "wanted" child is killed or dies, that a woman experiences subsequent negative mental consequences.
Further research, the report said, must "highlight the importance of taking pregnancy intendedness and wantedness into account when seeking to understand psychological reactions to abortion."
The report is the result of a year-long review of mental health and abortion by a task force appointed by the APA.
Critics at the time the APA announced the task force pointed out that its membership was heavily weighted with researchers who supported abortion as a legal "right."
Andrea Mrozek, a Toronto-based writer and researcher and contributor to Pro-Woman, Pro-Life, wrote that at least one of the six-member task force assigned by the APA had already produced flawed research denying the suggestion of psychological consequences of abortion. Brenda Major, Mrozek wrote, was the principal author of a study "where fully fifty per cent of the study sample was lost and yet the authors still managed to declare abortion does not harm women."
The anti-violence group Consistent Life pointed out in letters to the APA that while the organisation claims to base all its positions strictly on scientific research, they have, since 1969, held the "clear political stand" "of abortion as being a civil right for women."
Mrozek said this assertion undermines the APA's credibility and that they ought to have dropped the "anachronistic old-school statement." "Abortion never was a right, not then, not now. And if they keep that sort of statement, it casts a pallour on their work regarding abortion and mental health."
The study also agreed with the abortion lobby slogans about abolishing "stigma" and supporting "choice." The real causes of psychological disturbance surrounding abortion, the report says, involves the "stigma, need for secrecy, and low or anticipated social support for the abortion decision" as well as "a prior history of mental health problems."
Cases of psychological disturbance following multiple abortions is "more equivocal" the report said, but concluded that these could be explained as part of "co-occurring risks" that might "predispose a woman to both multiple unwanted pregnancies and mental health problems."
Bill Samuel, President of Consistent Life also pointed out the lack of a balanced opinion on the task force. He pointed out that half of the members of the task force were "strong public advocates of the pro-choice view," while "advocates of the view that abortion is violence to both unborn children and to women, which could balance such biases, are ominously absent."
Samuel also criticised the timing of the report that comes in an election year in which abortion is a critical issue in both parties.
"The APA position is in accord with that of one of the major political parties, and in opposition to that of the other," Samuel wrote. "When a prestigious organization puts out a report on a politically volatile issue at a time when political passions run particularly high, any imbalance on the task force will not pass unnoticed...We hope you will pause to reflect upon how partisan this will appear."
The report is scheduled to be presented at this week's annual conference of the APA in Boston.
Read related LifeSiteNews.com coverage:
APA Panel Convened to Discuss Abortion After Effects is Stacked with Deniers
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2007/may/07050811.html
APA Admits Mental Problems Resulting From Abortion Ignored by Official Position
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2006/feb/06021605.html
"Evidence Doesn't Matter" in APA Abortion Advocacy
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2006/feb/060216A.html
Abortion Causes Mental Disorders: New Zealand Study May Require Doctors To Do Fewer Abortions
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2006/feb/060210a.html
1 word...bullsh*t.
Pro-Life Ping
wow. just wow. What a bunch of lies! More stories need to come out from women that have had abortions. I have seen and heard a lot of pain in the years to follow, as well as beforehand and directly following. People have even tried committing suicide.
Well, they’re probably right because anyone who aborts a child HAS NO CONSCIENCE therefore abortion doesn’t bother them a bit.
just death. that’s all. back to the dancefloor....
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
This is why Psychology is not a science. It is an art form at best.
Disgusting. American Psychological Association has no credibility.
The APA couldn't care less about appearing partisan. That's pretty much SOP with them.
I have a degree in statistics and it is pretty much true that people like me can manipulate the data to get it to say what we want. I think we have a case of that here.
Remember, this is the group that claims sex between adults and children isn’t necessarily bad for the children.
Odds are good they don't go through the list of women who ordered up abortions, but rather the list of women who came in for some sort of psychological or psychiatric evaluation.
Or, possibly even those with a run in with the law ~
Whatever they do to pick up subjects the odds are good that the researchers end up with a group heavily representative of typical sociopathic personality types.
I seriously doubt any of them had the slightest concern for the unborn.
The researchers knew this would be the case when they designed their study and selected the subjects.
That's because, as it turns out, most of those interested in proving that abortion causes no problems are, themselves, sociopaths.
So... Abortion has no negative psychological consequences and homosexuality is a normal form of behavior?
I thing the American Psychological Association is composed of people with serious mental health issues - They are at very least delusional and may be suffering from other schizophrenic tendencies.
********************
Who takes the APA seriously these days? They've established their bias for some time now.
'nuff said.
jw
It's even easier when you ignore and/or distort the evidence so that it says exactly what you want.
These people are stupid. This is on par with claiming that there really are 10 times as many ADHD cases as there were 40 years ago.
The APA's credibility died when thy declared that homosexuality was NOT a mental disorder. Their pronouncements have been worthless ever since.
...but actually giving birth DOES, Postpartum Depression?
WTF?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.