Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Maximilian
That’s like telling the Iraqi Republican Guard that they’d be able to defeat the US military the second time around as long as they have a few SAMs available.

Look at what the insurgency did to us. If Kerry won in 2004, the IRG would have won.

The problem with this idea is the Russians are not civilized. They will have no problem killing every civilian in Georgia. Is that a price Georgians want to pay for their freedom? We should have supplied them with modern weapons before the Russians invaded. Better late than never though.

If the Russians do honor the cease fire and pull back, we should supply the Georgians with these weapons and then blow up the tunnel. That would make supplying Ossedia much harder and expensive.

14 posted on 08/16/2008 1:10:14 PM PDT by Tramonto (Regime change in Russia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Tramonto
Look at what the insurgency did to us. If Kerry won in 2004, the IRG would have won.

What did they do -- blow up a few bombs? Militarily the "insurgency" compared to the US Military was never more than a flea compared to an elephant. President Bush had the political will to demonstrate that fact, but it was always the objective reality, no matter who won the 2004 election.

The same is true in Georgia, only more so. Unlike the US in Iraq, Russia is fighting on their own doorstep. The "insurgents" in this case are pro-Russian. The Ossetians want to be part of Russia, not Georgia.

So you want to send weapons to Georgia so that they can fight the Russian military and the native population of Ossetians? And why is this something other than madness?

15 posted on 08/16/2008 1:28:57 PM PDT by Maximilian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson