Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PugetSoundSoldier

“Yet here, another woman’s insistance that the Chinese gymnasts look underage is without question...”

Why do you insist on confusing an underage who looks older with an entire team of girls who claim to be older but look much younger?

One woman’s daughter on a message board versus an entire team of girls whose age is not questioned just here but virtually EVERYWHERE, backed up by documentation that ALSO demonstrates these girls are not of age. You can keep pretending it’s a bunch of clueless westerners who just don’t know how small Asians are (because they’re all so tiny, right?), or you can pay attention to the entirety of the issue.


78 posted on 08/17/2008 12:01:27 PM PDT by Sandreckoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: Sandreckoner

Apparently your reading comprehension is down quite a bit today...

I’ve said SEVERAL TIMES that if there’s other documentation about age - great! Bring it up - please!

The thread has been about the appearance of the gymnasts, and I’ll stand fast that you just can’t look and tell age - you simply can’t.

Apparently you missed the summary of the start of the thread:

“Chinese coaches tried to hide the ages of the girls with “enough makeup to shame a drag queen,” but no amount of lipstick and eyeliner can hide the fact that the American gymnasts have curves and breasts and the Chinese ones don’t. On average, the girls on the Chinese team are 3.5 inches shorter and 30 pounds lighter than their American counterparts....”

Now how that does NOT point to appearance I haven’t a clue.

This thread is about the physical appearance, plain and simple. And the reality is that several OTHER posters in this thread have pointed out the same thing I have: asian women appear younger than you think.

And several have added that gymnasts - including Americans - mature much more slowly. Add those two facts together and you end up with a team that may look to be all 13 and 14 years old but very well could be 16+.

So read the opening again, and get back to me on that whole premise that I do not want to question their age. I’ve posted here that if there’s other information, that’s what you need to use. Looks alone - as this thread opened with - simply doesn’t cut it.


86 posted on 08/17/2008 12:07:57 PM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson