Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fightinJAG
Does anybody know if there's a stat on how many servicemen in the AEF were lost to the Spanish Influenza? How do these losses compare to combat losses?

Reason I'm asking is that I once read that the US Civil War was the first major conflict in which losses to direct combat were larger than so-called “camp deaths”. I'm wondering if that statement can be true, or whether it holds for WW1.

15 posted on 08/17/2008 4:50:54 PM PDT by Tallguy ("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tallguy
There are some figures here but it's a tough read. They probably don't know for sure how many died of flu complications.
20 posted on 08/17/2008 5:44:07 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Tallguy
Reason I'm asking is that I once read that the US Civil War was the first major conflict in which losses to direct combat were larger than so-called “camp deaths”. I'm wondering if that statement can be true, or whether it holds for WW1.No the losses in the Civil War where about 3 men lost to diseases for every compat loss

http://www.civilwarhome.com/casualties.htm

At least 618,000 Americans died in the Civil War, and some experts say the toll reached 700,000. The number that is most often quoted is 620,000.
At any rate, these casualties exceed the nation's loss in all its other wars, from the Revolution through Vietnam.

The Union armies had from 2,500,000 to 2,750,000 men. Their losses, by the best estimates: Battle deaths: 110,070 Disease, etc.: 250,152 Total 360,222

The Confederate strength, known less accurately because of missing records, was from 750,000 to 1,250,000. Its estimated losses: Battle deaths: 94,000 Disease, etc.: 164,000 Total 258,000

26 posted on 08/17/2008 6:07:10 PM PDT by Charlespg (Peace= When we trod the ruins of Mecca and Medina under our infidel boots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Tallguy
I once read that the US Civil War was the first major conflict in which losses to direct combat were larger than so-called “camp deaths”

Not so for both the Civil war and the Spanish-American war which had far more deaths from sickness that battlefield injuries. I have read both that WWI was the first war with more combat deaths and the opposite. It may depend on if you count the influenza deaths which continued after the armistice. WWII was indisputably one with more combat deaths at least in the American armed forces.

37 posted on 08/17/2008 7:25:39 PM PDT by Vietnam Vet From New Mexico (Pray For Our Troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson