The capability of RNA to autocatalize is Scientific evidence in support of the hypothetical involvement of RNA in abiogenesis.
The ability of the early earth atmosphere to spontaneously form biological molecules is another piece of evidence is support of they hypothesis of abiogenesis.
What “Scientific evidence” do you have to support the ‘Easter Bunny’ hypothesis over the theory of “chicken eggs colored by children”?
Scientists working on abiogenesis is no different than kids coloring eggs as evidence for the Easter Bunny. Both are conspicuously absent from observation.
"The capability of RNA to autocatalize is Scientific evidence in support of the hypothetical involvement of RNA in abiogenesis."
Only to the credulous, my friend. Only to the credulous. It's just a blue easter egg. There's still no Easter Bunny.
"The ability of the early earth atmosphere to spontaneously form biological molecules is another piece of evidence is support of they hypothesis of abiogenesis."
I don't think anyone still assumes that the early atmosphere was reducing. Much less solve the right-handed vs left-handed problem, the non-existent amino acid trap, etc, etc, etc. That easter egg doesn't even exist anymore. But hey, that's science for you.
"What “Scientific evidence” do you have to support the ‘Easter Bunny’ hypothesis over the theory of “chicken eggs colored by children”?"
The fact that children can color eggs just like the Easter Bunny did is proof that there surely was (and most likely still is) an Easter Bunny.