Replies

Ok then, you seem to go from electromagnetism, to gravity, to tides, back to gravity. No answer as to how the force would move the massive Sun while leaving the tiny Earth motionless in violation of Force = mass *acceleration.

Also you have not cited a single Biblical passage in support of Geocentricism.

Claiming I don't understand what you are obviously not saying while claiming you are seems your only tactic, and it is a rather shoddy one, but in keeping with the general intellectual and honesty level of your posts.

One word answer: What force drags the Sun around the Earth? (hint, there is only the Strong, the Electromagnetic, and Gravity; pick one).

Citation answer: What biblical passage do you feel supports Geocentricity?

Inability to type one word and one citation speaks volumes about you. One hides only that which they cannot defend.

"Ok then, you seem to go from electromagnetism, to gravity, to tides, back to gravity. No answer as to how the force would move the massive Sun while leaving the tiny Earth motionless in violation of Force = mass *acceleration."

Just answering questions. There's no getting around the fact that geocentrism is equivalent to geokineticism under GR per Einstein, Hoyle, Born and Ellis. To claim that there is some physically significant difference is to reject GR because GR says there is none. If it doesn't make sense it's because you don't understand.

"Claiming I don't understand what you are obviously not saying while claiming you are seems your only tactic, and it is a rather shoddy one, but in keeping with the general intellectual and honesty level of your posts."

Claiming that I have not answered your questions seems your only tactic, and it is a rather shoddy one, but in keeping with the general intellectual and honesty level of your posts.