Given his previous threat(s), I find it more likely that he shot the second dog in its yard and then lied than I do that the wounded animal crawled back under the fence.
The fact is none of us know what really transpired. And I think the guy telling the story is full of it.
I disagree. A pound of hamburger laced with ground glass and tossed over the fence would've been evidence that Wyatt was "out to get" those dogs. I'm certain that his back yard has sufficient evidence to either support his story or call it into legal question.
I bear some responsibility when my kid hits a baseball through your window. You gonna kill him, too? Baseballs can cause serious injury!!
Yeah, you're right... every few months there's a story on the news about how a baseball ripped the throat out of a toddler.
“Given his previous threat(s), I find it more likely that he shot the second dog in its yard and then lied than I do that the wounded animal crawled back under the fence.
The fact is none of us know what really transpired. And I think the guy telling the story is full of it.”
So you think the person telling the story is a liar. You LOVE reading things into stories, don’t you?
According to you, the guy had it in for the dogs. Lied about the dogs being threatening, and lied about where the dogs were shot.
The guy that killed the dogs also should have filled in the hole under the fence, and shouldn’t have been allowed out of his house at night.
Would it have been okay if “Wyatt Earp” had fed, watered, and groomed the pets for the owner, too?