Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Holicheese
I am really torn on this subject.

You shouldn't be. We send out youths to college, where they are separated from home supervision - a challenge that may are not able to handle. With the drinking age at 21, we again separate our youths from any chance of supervison or socialization with those knowledgable with drinking alcohol, a potentially deadly pursuit. Why is it good to have such a "failure trap"?

It is far better to permit consumption under more controlled circumstances, where behavior is in the open and subject at least to greater socialization. It is always good to keep ourselves in flocks, rather than alone in a wilderness.

18 posted on 08/26/2008 7:42:15 AM PDT by frithguild (We have found a tumor beneath the penumbra - is there a surgeon in the Court?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: frithguild

“It is always good to keep ourselves in flocks, rather than alone in a wilderness.” That is just lovely.

I understand your point. I see that I think I was mature enough to handle it at 18, now I see just young kids. I go into a bar now and see a 21 year old and say, “No way that kid is legal!”


32 posted on 08/26/2008 7:54:13 AM PDT by Holicheese (Rasdower, Zap Rasdower!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson