“When a conservative former Fort Detrick public affairs officer, and a liberal activist opposing Detrick’s biolab expansion, agree that Bruce Ivins was not the anthrax killer...”
“there is no logic in this leading statement, which makes me think the whole article is junk.”
Yea, you’ve got a good point there.
Is it then fair to say that you believe that Ivins WAS the anthrax mailer?
“Norm Covert, a conservative former Fort Detrick public affairs officer] echoes what is widely reported by reputable scientists. The anthrax in the mailings, he says, was “highly bred, weapons-grade ... with a silica coating and a slight electrical charge so that each particle repelled the other ... each particle no more than five microns.” Ivins had neither the expertise nor the equipment to create such a sophisticated form of anthrax.....”