Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LibLieSlayer

I’d have no problem with Lieberman at Defense or State..... just NO POWELL


9 posted on 09/07/2008 8:21:14 AM PDT by Lib-Lickers 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Lib-Lickers 2
Yes I agree... I have read in depth things about Powell that were written by his superior officers... he does not need to be anywhere near government... he is as empty as barry hussein.

LLS

29 posted on 09/07/2008 8:40:40 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (GOD, Country, Family... except for dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Lib-Lickers 2

I agree, Powell is another grandee in love with himself, who wants to be loved by all the right people. For Secretary of State, to take on the permanent bureaucracy at Foggy Bottom requires someone with the courage of his convictions. If not John Bolton, then why not Joe?


30 posted on 09/07/2008 8:41:49 AM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Lib-Lickers 2

Agree. Powell should not be in any Administration. I liked him as a general ... as a SECDEF he woefully under impressed me.


36 posted on 09/07/2008 8:48:47 AM PDT by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Lib-Lickers 2
I’d have no problem with Lieberman at Defense or State..... just NO POWELL

DITTO!!!!!!
60 posted on 09/07/2008 9:12:54 AM PDT by Ugot2Bkidding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson