And the main issue the non-moonbat crowd had with the Iraq War was its execution, not the decision to invade.
Obama didn’t make some kind of heroic decision to oppose the war. In his crazy far left neighborhood in which someone like William Ayers is viewed as Ned Flanders, an anti-war viewpoint was the mainstream view.
Obama was a great candidate for the Democrat primaries, but a sucky one for the general. Biden, HRC, et al said that and then some during the primaries. There’s a lot of ‘I told you sos’ going around among Dems these days...
Obama’s judgment should be what is targeted. Not his name or background or any of that nonsense, but simply put his judgment. As short as his political career has been, he has shown some remarkably horrendous judgment. This is where the difference between McCain and Obama is clear. Obama has no proper judgment, he is naive beyond belief and his lack of personal conviction(flip-flop) anyone and doing what is politically rewarding and not what he feels to be correct, is going to be his undoing.
Ayers? Reverand Wright? Rezko? Kwame Kilpatrick?
Where is this man’s judgment indeed?
...”And the main issue the non-moonbat crowd had with the Iraq War was its execution, not the decision to invade.”...
I disagree a bit. I think the main issue was that it was a GOP President - GWB - sucessfully conducting a war rather than a democrat party POTUS. If it was Bill Clinton, imagine the cheerleading from the democrats/msm, academia (”Clinton’s Strategic Thinking” would be expounded upon ad nauseum by empty-headed, pencil-neck leftist professors and think-tank twits), and hollywood nimrods who would already have crafted 17 feature films on Clinton’s brilliance.
The hypocrisy exhibited by all the shameful parties to this deception is stunningly evident, except to democrats.