Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Two things McCain should do today (vanity, but substantial [?])
9/11/08 | Daniel J. Phillips

Posted on 09/11/2008 4:45:34 AM PDT by BibChr

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

1 posted on 09/11/2008 4:45:34 AM PDT by BibChr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BibChr
His ego craves the offices, so he'd have something to write about in his next memoir. Her ego craves power, so she'd do it. The only question is whether Biden's ego would allow it.

I disagree with you here.

No way is Hillary going to want to jump in now.

Firstly, too many of her supporters HATE Obama and they'd have to also vote for him, in order to vote for her.

Secondly, if Hillary were VP and they pulled off a win in November, the Dem's would be in such bad shape by 2012, that Hillary would never, ever get a chance to run for President again (she'd be too old by the time the Dem's have another shot, given what a four-year, Obama-lead Presidency would do to this country).

Thirdly (and lastly), Obama would look like a huge pu**y if he changed his running mate right now. The only people who would not switch to McCain/Palin would be the one's who would never switch in the first place. And there's no way he's going to get 50% (or close) that way.

2 posted on 09/11/2008 4:51:40 AM PDT by library user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
I agree that the "Torricelli Option" is always on the table for Dems, but I am beginning to think that Hillary has no interest in being the secondo to a sinking ship. She is better poised to let Obama go down and be the party savior in '12. So who does he pick? Granholm? Pathetic. Plus the McCain ads write themselves.

On the religious front, I am pretty sure that the campaign doesn't want to go there, because of Jeremiah, the bullfrog.

Time will tell, of course, but I agree that this campaign appears to be doing a good job and I am willing to let them go with it (rather than calling me for my brilliant advice!)

3 posted on 09/11/2008 4:52:05 AM PDT by ajwharton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
but substantial [?]

No, not really. But whatever.

4 posted on 09/11/2008 4:54:41 AM PDT by Tax-chick ("McCain and Palin: The Normal People Revolution" ~ rrrod)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BibChr

COLORADO AND NEVADA
COLORADO AND NEVADA
COLORADO AND NEVADA


5 posted on 09/11/2008 4:56:05 AM PDT by tomymind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: library user

Fourthly, Hillary will not take the VP candidacy because it eliminates her main weapon(and defense), “victimhood”! She would no longer be able to use it were she to run against a woman. It is one of the reasons she has not attacked Palin while stumping for zer0bama.


6 posted on 09/11/2008 5:00:59 AM PDT by Roccus (Someday it will all make sense............maybe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
Your analysis is right on.

One question that needs to be asked is why Baraq Hussein Obama is running so hard against the VP candidate? Is it because he just doesn't measure up to McCain?

Expect the dims to get much deeper in the gutter - that's their habitat.

7 posted on 09/11/2008 5:09:53 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (Just your average "Whitey" - bitterly clinging to my guns and religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ajwharton

I agree. I don’t think Hillary wants anything really to do with the Obamanation. She’s looking at 2012.


8 posted on 09/11/2008 5:11:44 AM PDT by SumProVita ("Cogito ergo sum pro vita." .....updated Descartes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ajwharton
So who does he pick? Granholm?

Couldn't if he wanted to. She was born in Canada.
9 posted on 09/11/2008 5:13:37 AM PDT by MaryFromMichigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: library user

“Thirdly (and lastly), Obama would look like a huge pu**y if he changed his running mate right now.”

He looks like a huge pu**y right now. No need for waiting on that!


10 posted on 09/11/2008 5:14:09 AM PDT by roaddog727 (BS does not get bridges built - the funk you see is the funk you do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
Hi, Dan - good post. Ralph Peters had a column today that is along these lines - and made a really good connection that I hadn't thought of yet:

WHY OUR ELITES FEAR FAITH

Believers are mocked (if not too publicly at election time). Sen. Barack Obama's behind-closed-doors remark in San Francisco to the effect that worried blue-collar chumps cling to God and guns perfectly captured the left's worldview, equating faith and firearms as equal menaces to an enlightened society.

Then along came Palin to appall the establishment - a moose-hunting Christian with a working-class husband, the precise stereotype Obama had mocked. The media's attacks on her since her nomination have been the most unfair I've ever seen.

11 posted on 09/11/2008 5:29:50 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: library user; ajwharton
I hope you're right, but I'm not so sure. Power, any power, is an aphrodisiac to people like Hillary. I don't know that she'd pass up a now-thing for a maybe-thing.

But even given that you're right, Obama has so few original ideas of his own that I can easily see him saying to himself, "That game-changing thing of McCain's was cool. I want some of that. Let's see... who to pick? Who to pick?"

We'll never regret being prepared for the worst. Agreed?

12 posted on 09/11/2008 5:30:50 AM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
Sorry, and surprised, that you think so.

But, whatever.

13 posted on 09/11/2008 5:31:28 AM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Roccus

You sure that “Savior” doesn’t appeal to her even more than “Victim”? I know it’s a big thing to Dems these days... but I’m not so sure.


14 posted on 09/11/2008 5:32:23 AM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
But even given that you're right, Obama has so few original ideas of his own that I can easily see him saying to himself, "That game-changing thing of McCain's was cool. I want some of that. Let's see... who to pick? Who to pick?"

There are ramifications to just dropping a VP candidate. The delegates have officially nominated both of them, by name, so it isn't just a matter of Obama shoving Biden over for Hillary. I am not sure of the exact procedure (it is pretty unprecedented), but it would -- at the very least -- involve the DNC changing some rule, some how. That, in and of itself, would be a spectacle.

15 posted on 09/11/2008 5:36:34 AM PDT by ajwharton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Dirtboy! Long time, no chat!

That is an column, and very apropos. Thanks for it.

16 posted on 09/11/2008 5:39:48 AM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
Somewhere, not sure where, I read where Biden said that Hillary was the better candidate. Wow!
17 posted on 09/11/2008 5:40:53 AM PDT by greeter70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
Second, Team McCain needs to ready further for attacks on Palin's religious faith.

Well hell yeah. Look at all the questions Obama's gotten and the flack he's taken over Wright? You think the Democrats are just going to roll over and leave Palin's church out of it? They're thinking payback.

18 posted on 09/11/2008 5:43:32 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ajwharton
Fair enough. But you and I both that the Democrats don't play by the rules.

Things that would humiliate and ruin a conservative Republican don't even cross a Dem's radar screen. So — gosh, we could just let our imagination roam. Biden could say he knew he wasn't helping the campaign, the issues are too important, McCain too dangerous, he loves America too much, yadda yadda yadda — and so, for the good of This Great Country, and the wonderful Obamessiah, he will fall on his sword to make way for a much better and visionary candidate, blah blah blah.

We'll never be prepared if we think the Dems will be fair or rational.

If the last sixteen years have taught me anything, they've taught me this: power means more to Dems than anything in the universe.

19 posted on 09/11/2008 5:44:30 AM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BibChr

She can’t ‘save’ her party if she can’t defeat her opposition. Without the shield of ‘victim’, she is toast. Just look at how she played that card against Lazio. She won’t be able to pull that crap against Palin.


20 posted on 09/11/2008 5:44:48 AM PDT by Roccus (ABLE DANGER???? WHAT'S AN ABLE DANGER????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson