[GourmetDan]

"You can question anything you want. Just be prepared to back it up with evidence. A scientist that can't do that isn't going to have much of a career."

'Science' gets to make up any after-the-fact story it wants as long as the evidence is interpreted through the filter of the philosophy of naturalism. No other filters are allowed because naturalists actually believe that equating technological success and origins philosophy is appropriate.

It never occurs to them that their equivocation begs the very question they are being challenged on.

"Get over it."

"The use of unnecessary rudeness has been approved." (adapted from The Blues Brothers)

[tacticalogic]

What exactly is this “philosophy of naturalism” your ranting about? Do you think scientists should just declare everything that can’t explain in the first 10 minutes of observation the result of some supernatural force and move on to something else?

[tpanther]

‘Science’ gets to make up any after-the-fact story it wants as long as the evidence is interpreted through the filter of the philosophy of naturalism. No other filters are allowed because naturalists actually believe that equating technological success and origins philosophy is appropriate.

It never occurs to them that their equivocation begs the very question they are being challenged on.

“Get over it.”

“The use of unnecessary rudeness has been approved.” (adapted from The Blues Brothers)

---

My and millions of others’ observations as well.

It’s like an official from the Democratic German Republic of East Germany lecturing someone on democracy.