[whattajoke]

My greatest argument against evolution is, how come if the dinosaurs had 180 million years to evolve they didn't even create a basic machine with one moving part, or create societies, homes, and other such things that man has been able to do in 2 million years.

It's "great arguments" like this that keep evolution firmly in place.

(Hint: Dinosaurs were reptiles for the most part. To date, no reptile has created a machine. They have, however, made "homes" so there goes part of your grand hypothesis.)

[LukeL]

But you are missing my point, why didn't they evolve into higher beings. Surely from the early Triassic up until KT evolution could form a higher level of brain function.

If you want to get into a ore recent argument, why is it that only humans have evolved to such a high level. Evolutionist argue there was a need involved for humans to reach the point we are at today, but that raises more questions as no other evolutionary line in primate history as done what we have.

[jimmyray]

To date, no reptile has created a machine. They have, however, made "homes" so there goes part of your grand hypothesis.

If they can't even develop a 450 horsepower 12 second musclecar, like my 73 Duster with a 408 stroker, they deserve to be extinct!