Replies

Gibsonized, my foot. You're just going to have to face the fact that evolution's leading apologist couldn't think of a single example of a genetic mutation or evolutionary process that has lead to an increase of genetic information in the genome. That's the reason why Dawkins suddenly froze and looked like he was having some sort of seizure. Notice that when he finally recovered enough to start moving his mouth again, he still couldn't answer the question, and instead began babbling on about fishes and reptiles and various other gobbledygook that had nothing to do with the question.

The fact I have to face is that you’re so consumed by your anti-Darwin mania that you can’t even think straight. Come on, the guy talks about this stuff for a living and had just written a book dealing with the subject. It’s not a particularly shocking question—the subject comes up on these threads all the time. You think he’d never heard it before? Heck, you could probably come up with the evolutionist answer yourself, even though you think it’s wrong, if you’ve been paying attention here at all.