Better keep digging through the old archives. You’ve come up empty so far.
Your examples are NOT dependent on being brain-washed by evolutionism.
“Animal testing”: NOT.
Mice and men can die from drug overdoses, therefore they have a common ancestor? Or vice versa?
Further afield, the idea of taking canaries into coal mines could spring ONLY from the mind of a Darwinist miner?
Still further and sillier – frogs and watermelons are green on the outside, contain water and will be squished if you drive your car over them. Reason being, they both come from amphibia watermelonis (fossil to follow any day now).
“Genetic testing of families”: NOT.
The father of the field of genetics was Gregor Mendel, a Catholic monk (how dare those religious types infringe on science!). His ground-breaking work with pea plants (none of which turned into prunes) owed nothing to Charles Darwin.
“Drug-resistant bacteria”: NOT.
As Sister Mary Elephant might have said: “Class. Class. CLASS! SHUUUUT UUPP!!! Thank you. Now, for the twentieth time, class, what do antibiotic-resistant bacteria and non-antibiotic-resistant bacteria have in common? Anyone ? Anyone? Correct! THEY’RE BOTH BACTERIA!”
And are you really trying to make me believe that we never would have had a clue why the penicillin was no longer effective UNLESS we believed in bacteria-to-Barry Bonds evolution?
And so, I repeat the question:
Can you, or anyone out there, name one, single, solitary scientific discovery or technological development, that has had a real impact (good or bad) on our every day lives, for which belief in Darwinian or neo-Darwinian theory was indispensable?
...and that can't be distorted and misrepresented in such a way as to let me claim that it has nothing to do with evolutionary theory?"
Based on your performance with the last suggestions, I doubt anyone can.