Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rumblings In The Jungle – Journalists Turn On Charlie Gibson
Friends and fiends at network in NY and DC | MB26

Posted on 09/12/2008 1:03:36 PM PDT by MindBender26

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last
To: MindBender26

He acted very condescending, like she was a child and he the adult. It was very insulting.....


21 posted on 09/12/2008 1:22:48 PM PDT by Fawn (Who are these idiots who would vote for 'Obama Bin Biden' ????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChessExpert

>>>>That was nice. What is the source?

Old friends with a fully charged cell phone battery, my phone number and one too many Scotches at lunch.

:~)


22 posted on 09/12/2008 1:22:52 PM PDT by MindBender26 (Never kick a leftist when they are down. Wait until they are halfway back up. You get more leverage!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

I really PO’d ABC didnt go after Palin for eating live kittens!


23 posted on 09/12/2008 1:25:14 PM PDT by rrrod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mort56

I have to admit, I used to really like Charlie Gibson but after last night’s performance my opinion has been significantly lowered. I will be going out of my way to avoid him, now...and that’s sad.

He only succeeded in making himself much smaller than the esteem I once held for him and dozens of people are telling me the same thing. Wait until he gets back from Alaska to see how much the lower 48 has cooled (to him).

When I took Newswriting (At both Newhouse and Annenberg), the key was Objectivity. Somehow, someway, cute, sarcastic pot shots has replaced honor among these Gen X’ers and Tweeners. This just goes to show you that playing Grand Theft Auto 15 hours a week does not contribute to the civility of our national discourse.


24 posted on 09/12/2008 1:26:06 PM PDT by johnnycap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
I have spoken with a number of old TV journalist friends in last 12 hours.

Please provide their names and their affiliations. This article contains no sources.

As such, it can't be taken seriously.

25 posted on 09/12/2008 1:26:48 PM PDT by Chunga (Vote Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
And Pilosi says they want to instill a "Fairness Doctrine....."
The Fairness Doctrine would make sense if journalism were objective. But the conceit of journalistic objectivity would have struck the founding fathers as ridiculous, for the simple reason that newspapers of the day were cacophony of competing opinion, with hardly any news which was entirely unknown to the public at the time of printing.

The conceit of journalistic objectivity derives solely from the commercial imperatives of the Associated Press and its member newspapers, and it is the propaganda power of the AP and its members alone which provides that conceit with what passes for its basis in fact. The conceit of journalistic objectivity is baseless in fact, and politically it is profoundly subversive of democratic principle.

The Right to Know


26 posted on 09/12/2008 1:26:56 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The conceit of journalistic objectivity is profoundly subversive of democratic principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

Nice article.

We can assume that Gibson was operating under intense pressure to harass and provoke Gov. Palin in the hope of leading her into a gaffe. When no such moment emerged, ABC simply pretended Palin’s accurate summary of NATO’s responsibilities towards Georgia as a hypothetical member was warmongering. Still, pressure or no pressure, Gibson was certainly under no obligation to greet Palin with insinuating questions, false quotes and visible sneers. No doubt the scales fell from the eyes of a few more old media viewers after that performance.


27 posted on 09/12/2008 1:27:24 PM PDT by Interesting Times (Swiftboating, you say? Check out ToSetTheRecordStraight.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
It was a debate, a sucker-punch, loaded debate where one side got to choose the questions, interrupt the other side, and then in conclusion, score the debate and give the audience their slanted interpretation of what it all meant.

The lefties in old media believes that it is their privilege to do so. That is why talk radio and the Internet are such an important balance against them.

28 posted on 09/12/2008 1:28:15 PM PDT by BenLurkin (What did Obama's Koran instructors teach him about women?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
The haze of amazement hanging over the network newsroom is palatable.

I suspect you meant "palpable."

29 posted on 09/12/2008 1:28:52 PM PDT by Interesting Times (Swiftboating, you say? Check out ToSetTheRecordStraight.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

Turned him off years ago.


30 posted on 09/12/2008 1:28:56 PM PDT by KYGrandma (The sun shines bright on my old Kentucky home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mulligan; All
The shame of it is, I haven't been employed at ABC since 1965, (most of my Days of Infamy were at West 57th Street) was last on West 66th Street paying a social call on PJ in 1984, and still, every day, would hear from everyone, everywhere, how great a guy Charlie Gibson was!

Why, Charlie? Why?

31 posted on 09/12/2008 1:29:15 PM PDT by MindBender26 (Never kick a leftist when they are down. Wait until they are halfway back up. You get more leverage!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChessExpert

http://tinyurl.com/3lkev8


32 posted on 09/12/2008 1:29:58 PM PDT by preacher (A government which robs from Peter to pay Paul will always have the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

“That’s not the Charlie Gibson I knew”


33 posted on 09/12/2008 1:30:44 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (don't worry, they only want to take water out of the other guy's side of the bucket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

Gibson’s dripping condescension was disgusting.


34 posted on 09/12/2008 1:31:06 PM PDT by jporcus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chunga

>>>> Please provide their names and their affiliations.

Sources burned cease to be sources.

>>>> As such, it can’t be taken seriously.

Then don’t


35 posted on 09/12/2008 1:32:43 PM PDT by MindBender26 (Never kick a leftist when they are down. Wait until they are halfway back up. You get more leverage!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

Do you know if Charles Gibson is aware of being held in contempt by some viewers and colleagues?


36 posted on 09/12/2008 1:33:23 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (In VP's, McCain picked the future, Obama chose the past.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
The thing that had me gripping my arm chair like it was a snake I wanted to strangle was Mr. Gibson's MISQUOTE of Sarah Palin, and his insistence that those were her “exact words”. Yes they were, EXCERPTED!!!

It is the same as if I said...”Let us all pray that we are doing good and right and in accord with God's plan”.... and they edited it down to...... “We are doing good and right and in accord with God's plan”..... and then represented THAT as an ‘exact quote’.

LUDICROUS!

He also tried to pen her into making the ‘Obama Iwanna Obomb A Pakistan’ mistake. When she gave a “diplomatic” answer (what is required in such a circumstance) he pulled his “I got lost in a blizzard of words, was that a yes or no.”

37 posted on 09/12/2008 1:33:55 PM PDT by allmendream (Sa-RAH! Sa-RAH! Sa-RAH! RAH RAH RAH! McCain/Palin2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
I think Charlie showed a lot of deference toward women in his interview with Governor Palin.

Can you name one other male in journalism today who would go out of his way like Charlie did to make Katie Couric look like a competent journalist?

38 posted on 09/12/2008 1:33:59 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

As a Charlie myself, I have to say that the condescending Gibson was a disgrace to the League of Charlies. At our next meeting, we will no doubt vote to demote him to a “Chuck.”


39 posted on 09/12/2008 1:34:00 PM PDT by Charles Henrickson (Known by all as Charlie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times

You are so right.


40 posted on 09/12/2008 1:34:41 PM PDT by MindBender26 (Never kick a leftist when they are down. Wait until they are halfway back up. You get more leverage!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson