So if I am reading this correctly, it states that all previous laws in regards to the Secretary or the Federal Reserve are DONE AWAY WITH. Also, I have not heard or seen on any news source that the change in FDIC insurance is ONLY UNTIL DEC 2009.
Please go to the web site and on the left hand side SHARE YOUR OPINIONS with our wonderful Senate who...well I will not type what I feel.
1 posted on
10/02/2008 12:46:37 PM PDT by
blueyon
To: blueyon
2 posted on
10/02/2008 12:49:46 PM PDT by
hiredhand
(Understand the CRA and why we're facing economic collapse - see my about page.)
To: blueyon
It is with great reluctance that I have agreed to this calling. I love democracy. I love the Republic. The powers you give me I will lay down when this crisis has been abated!
To: blueyon
Great! So now the Council on Foreign Relations has complete control of our money.
5 posted on
10/02/2008 1:06:24 PM PDT by
wolfcreek
(I see miles and miles of Texas....let's keep it that way.)
To: blueyon
I'm not a lawyer, but it looks like section 135 is just saying that the Sec. of Treasury or the Federal Reserve are not subjected to new limitations of powers given by other laws. Basically it says "the old rules still apply".
6 posted on
10/02/2008 1:06:59 PM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(The $700B bail out is giving parachutes to bankers while we must keep our seat belts on and shut up.)
To: blueyon
You're reading it wrong.
All it says is that this particular act doesn't place new restrictions on previous laws.
To: blueyon
It’s because they’re the one’s controlling this process- kill the bankers power, and you kill this bill (and their stranglehold over Congress-and weaking of their thralldom over the US people)!
10 posted on
10/02/2008 2:38:53 PM PDT by
JSDude1
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson