Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ninergold3; LUV W
Maybe it’s above Brokaw’s paygrade to keep this fair and balanced.

How about Republicans grow a pair. Brokaw couldn't host ... er ... "moderate" this "debate" (which I'm not watching, only breezing through this thread) ... without one thing:

A presidential candidate.

Either candidate could hold the thing hostage. I say Republicans grow a pair and say okay, we have two moderators. Obama's team picks one, we pick one. Either that, or no "debate."

Are they so cowardly that they think the American public wouldn't respect some righteous calling-down?

If Obama wins, it will be by voter fraud. I wonder how many people will do anything about it?

4,507 posted on 10/07/2008 7:31:37 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3921 | View Replies ]


To: Finny
It's about 12+ years too late for the Pubbies to start dictating who, when and how they will be interviewed.

They should NEVER go on 98% of the networks...And if they do then DEMAND hand picked moderators.

But I'm dreaming................

5,052 posted on 10/07/2008 7:46:07 PM PDT by Osage Orange (" I did not have radical relations with that man, William Ayers. " -Barack Hussein Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4507 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson