When the couple divorced soon after, Dahl indicated that she wished to destroy the embryos because she "did not want anyone else to raise her child," and also feared that the child might one day contact his or her sibling, Dahl's naturally-conceived son. And she prefers infanticide?!
1 posted on
10/10/2008 4:54:52 PM PDT by
wagglebee
To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; 8mmMauser
2 posted on
10/10/2008 4:55:25 PM PDT by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; 50mm; 69ConvertibleFirebird; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; ...
3 posted on
10/10/2008 4:56:54 PM PDT by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
property rights? then he should at least get to keep at least 3 of the 6 embryos.
To: wagglebee
look at it another way, she could have had them without his permission and made him pay child support. I could see it happening. This ruling makes sure that both parties have to consent. Big ruling for the Bio-ethics people.
5 posted on
10/10/2008 5:01:22 PM PDT by
ClayinVA
("Those who don't remember history are doomed to repeat it")
To: wagglebee
8 posted on
10/10/2008 10:41:39 PM PDT by
Salvation
( †With God all things are possible.†)
To: wagglebee; Antoninus; abcraghead; aimhigh; Archie Bunker on steroids; bicycle thug; blackie; ...
Oregon Ping Please notify me via FReepmail if you would like to be added to or taken off the Oregon Ping List.
9 posted on
10/10/2008 10:43:11 PM PDT by
Salvation
( †With God all things are possible.†)
To: wagglebee
Who brings their children to this pediatrician?
11 posted on
10/11/2008 5:19:31 AM PDT by
BykrBayb
(May God have mercy on our souls. ~)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
