What sort of silly assumption is that based on, because one of those links is from a few months back? Wow, such powerful deductive reasoning.
Besides, you're wrong. I've followed every nook and cranny of this "story" from the beginning. I wish it were so, it would be an incredible story. But facts are facts. And the inescapable fact is that if the birth notice in the Hawaii paper is legit then Obama was indeed born in Hawaii as he claims. To believe otherwise is to align oneself with the and 9-11 truthers (like Berg).
BS. The “myth of Obama’s birth certificate” as you call it is much much more than if he was or was not born in Kenya. If you do not know that , I’m simply not wasting any more time trying to educate you.
PS. It is the equivalent of someone jumping in and claiming there is no “there there” regarding Ayers because Obama was recorded condemning his terrorist acts.
anyone can run a birth notice
And the inescapable fact is that if the birth notice in the Hawaii paper is legit then Obama was indeed born in Hawaii as he claims. To believe otherwise is to align oneself with the and 9-11 truthers (like Berg).
Others have attempted to look up birth notice in Hawaii paper archives....but, archives only go back to early 90’s, so where did tne notice originally appear. Is that bogus too, like the COLB’s posted by bho.