Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Danae

No surprise. I’d like to hear their reasoning, though.


10 posted on 10/17/2008 8:57:22 AM PDT by nobama08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nobama08

Pretty sure their reasoning was the same as the lower court that said it was unreasonable to expect the state to get a new computer system up and running before election day in time to stop the massive fraud underway.

Oops, I mean they said it was unreasonable to expect the state to get a new computer system up and running before election day, and that the existing system would do.

So the bottom line is that massive voter fraud in Ohio (and, a dozen other states) will be aided and abetted by the computer system of the state of Ohio (and of a dozen other states, apparently).


31 posted on 10/17/2008 9:01:41 AM PDT by VigilantAmerican (We will not waver, we will not tire; we will not falter, we will not fail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: nobama08

Basically the Court said that the respondents (the Ohio GOP) were unlikely to prevail on the issue of whether Congress had authorized the Federal Courts to enforce a restraining order based on a lawsuit by a private litigant.

Apparently the Ohio Secretary of State is free to ignore the law unless the mechanisms of the State intervene, as is Governor Strickland is about to do something about this travesty.


111 posted on 10/17/2008 9:18:02 AM PDT by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson