Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
What else would it be?

Will the court visit the old version "This card is not for identification puposes"?

37 posted on 10/20/2008 1:00:22 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (Election '08, the year McCain defined the word "dilemma")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Las Vegas Ron

For identification purposes, the person presenting the card cannot be securely identified with the card alone. That doesn’t negate the truth that the Social Security number represents you to the government. It is your sole number, not assigned to another person on the planet.

If someone uses it, they are in effect saying they are you. They have stolen you identity at that point. They are passing themselves off as you, even if they don’t use your name in the process (IMO). That number stands on it’s own.


39 posted on 10/20/2008 1:09:18 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Is Obamanation what our founding fathers, our fallen men in combat, and Ronald Reagan had in mind?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson