Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LonePalm; Calpernia

Ok-Ok. So the research I posted was not so on point. What it does show is a bais toward reaching an adjudication on the merits rather than based upon procedure.

In this case, it will be up to the Plaintiff here to file a motion for summary disposition based upon the discovery default. The hearing ofthis will take a few weeks, so there is no quick decision. Obama then comes and makes arguments in opposition - like the serving of Request for Admissions was not permitted in the Discovery Order - Or the dog ate my homework - and the judge puts you back on track in preparing for trial.

The Court won’t give you one fast and dirty - and especially not in this case.


97 posted on 10/21/2008 6:46:45 AM PDT by frithguild (Can I drill your head now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: frithguild; Calpernia
One would think that, in this case, time is of the essence since one of the stated purposes of the lawsuit is to prevent a Constitutional Crisis.

Thank you for your efforts.

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)

LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

146 posted on 10/21/2008 7:19:04 AM PDT by LonePalm (Commander and Chef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

To: frithguild
"The Court won’t give you one fast and dirty"

How was Ohio able to fast-track to the Federal Courts and then to SCOTUS for the voter registration issues?

231 posted on 10/21/2008 8:36:20 AM PDT by Deaf Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson