Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TChris

The B looks very consistent with the attacker crouched over her head from behind, controlling her by grabbing a handful of her hair. He could have pinner her head between his knees with a handful of hair in one hand and whatever it is he used to mutilate her face with the other (screwdriver? Puncture weapons common amongst those in and out of prison).

Or, he could have slammed her to the ground, slammed a knee in her face giving her the black eye and pinned her head to the pavement long enough to whip out a quick B on her face, again, with her body streached out in front of him and he behind her head.

If you review mugging videos, this is common for the perp to be in this position, especially when attacking women.

Most guys who are strong or used to be strong in their youth know how easy it is to control a woman just wrestling around in fun without harming her. I mean picking a woman up and throwing her or slamming her down into the water is child’s play to a strong man, as anyone who has played with women in a pool or in the water at the beach can attest to. Just a fact of life, weaker sex and all that.

Add size, strength, hatred and adrenaline to that and a strong man has superhuman strength compared to the average woman.

In light of Obama’s divisiveness and call to violence urging his people to “Get in the face” of all who oppose his bid for Marxist control (code words for “Attack”, this attack by what amounts to an Obama Operative is perfectly consistent with the countless reports of violence perpetrated by Obama Operatives since this contest began.

Actually, Democrats have been doing this stuff more and more each election. Shooting up houses, attacking our people, defacing posters, graffiti and the like. Started two elections ago.

At some point we will have to declare that things cannot continue like this and either take it where it needs to go or have a serious discussion about a peaceful (if possible) break up of the Union and both sides form up new governments.

The Socialists can form Communism in their areas as that is their true desire, and the rest of us can keep the original ideology of freedom the nation was founded on.

After all, how would that be much different from Europe which the Democrats so highly champion? Isn’t that what the NeoSocialists want anyway? Just because we break up into our respective areas doesn’t mean we couldn’t still have alliances just as the Europeans do.

The Democrats have succeeded in their goal of dividing and Balkanizing the nation.

So, we’ll keep the nukes and the military which the Democrats hate anyway, and the oil, and they can keep their latte sipping areas and tofu. Both sides would get along a lot better and be a lot less stressed out. I’m not seeing a downside to it.


715 posted on 10/23/2008 3:25:23 PM PDT by FTL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 661 | View Replies ]


To: FTL
In light of Obama’s divisiveness and call to violence urging his people to “Get in the face” of all who oppose his bid for Marxist control (code words for “Attack”, this attack by what amounts to an Obama Operative is perfectly consistent with the countless reports of violence perpetrated by Obama Operatives since this contest began.

It is dangerously irresponsible to promote tactics like that to a populous that is prone to the sort of violence that is already out of control. That is not racial profiling, before someone gets on that band wagon. It is just true. And in every major city, which are liberal bastions, the rule of law is to make excuses for it, and criminalize legal behavior. This helped cause this problem to begin with!

768 posted on 10/23/2008 3:51:36 PM PDT by gidget7 (Duncan Hunter-Valley Forge Republican!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 715 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson