Replies

You have that incorrect, since Indonesia would require renouncing the US citizenship to quailify for school in Indonesia, so his school documents in Indonesia reflect solely Indonesian citizenship, again, they did't allow for dual. It does not matter that US did allow dual, that is NOT where he was.

First, I seriously doubt that the school would not be that stringent if the father provided the adoption papers. The point is that the Obama himself would have to personally and formally denounce his US citizenship before a US Consular official in Jakarta. Being a minor at age 6, that just wouldn't be allowed. I say that advisedly having worked at the US Embassy in Jakarta as a foreign service officer including doing a stint in the consular section.

You will find the answer to the questions you raise in this documentary:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pR0pKUs-mmI beginning at ~4:55 and following. Documentation provided that proves Indonesian citizenship.
"The only ones that could go to school in Indonesia were Indonesian citizens, so Obama would have been either adopted by his stepfather or acknowledged by his stepfather as his son. Either way then he could have gone to school...His school record says that, what's your name, there his name was 'Barry Sotoro', what's your nationality, Indonesia, what's your religion, Islam. This a person that says I've never been a Muslim."

The documents can be found on obamacrimes.com.

Incidently, your initial sentence contains a dbl negative,"First, I seriously doubt that the school would not be that stringent if the father provided the adoption papers. by the which you do then correctly emphasize the school would indeed be stringent as Indonesia was at war at the time and therefore these issues were strictly controlled and his US citizenship would be denounced by his parents action, he being a minor and'adopted' by this Indonesian stepfather.
Just an obeservation: That I would have struck upon a person involved as an official in the Jakarta US Consulate is highly doubtlful, sorry I don't believe you on that score, too many tell tale signs in your references, it would seem you're not an 'expert witness' as you claim.