Posted on 10/27/2008 5:56:09 AM PDT by sciencefreeper
US presidential elections involve a fabulous expense of time, effort and money. Doubtless it is all too much – but, by the end, nobody can complain that the candidates have been too little scrutinised. We have learnt a lot about Barack Obama and John McCain during this campaign. In our view, it is enough to be confident that Mr Obama is the right choice.
...
Mr Obama is most disappointing on trade. He pandered to protectionists during the primaries, and has not rowed back. He may be sincere, which is troubling. Should he win the election, a Democratic Congress will expect him to keep those trade-thumping promises. Mr McCain has been bravely and consistently pro-trade, much to his credit.
(Excerpt) Read more at ft.com ...
Have they lost their minds?
Maybe they sold them...
UK and the other Europe countries love Obama. So what’s new.
Keep your bloody nose out of our business, chaps.
Leni
We seem to have fought wars for Eurosocialism, which is determined to destroy our constitutional form of government.
Why worry about the little people at this point, they learned a very good lesson from Paulson, BFRANK,Pelosi, Dodd, and the most glorious of all their highest potantate Hussein Obama.
Fool em once, fool em twice.........
Obama is terrible for trade but the right man for the White House? I must be missing something here.
I don't think so. The Financial Times has been squishy-Left for as long as I can remember.
Any reputable financial rag that recommends an a socialist deserves to drown in an ocean of red ink. This endorsement should invalidate anything the FT ever prints again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.