[jeffc]

Nice try? Up yours.

What's your problem? You almost try to defend the Times by saying Mitchell might well be a janitor and not a reporter, and you got outed as wrong. You're the one who should have done a little search on Mitchell before you posted your comment (I did!).

Face it. you're wrong, Valum is right. Take it like a man.

[Scutter]

My "problem" is that overreactions and conspiracy theories actually hurt our credibility and drown out the legitimate and compelling objections to 0bama and the other libtards. Imagine some person, skeptical about Obama, who comes here and sees some inane post drawing invalid conclusions based on faulty logic - the lead article in Breaking News, I might add - and they'll leave without ever seeing any of the truly compelling articles.

If you actually go back and read my post in its entirety, you will see I was quite clear that I wasn't defending the times and that I thought they were biased (first sentence of the post). I also said EVEN IF HE IS A REPORTER, the fact that the guy made a Facebook post doesn't prove anything about the times.

Where do you work? Do your posts here reflect the opinion of your employer?