Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Election results from Hart's Location, NH
Hart's Location web site ^ | 11/4/08 | Hart's Location

Posted on 11/03/2008 9:53:50 PM PST by rwilliam

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last
To: snarkytart

FFS?

wow...a voice of calm and reason

pack mentality has always been the bane of this forum regardless of the issue

it’s one thing to be skeptical of polls, it’s quite another to think they are all one grand conspiracy


61 posted on 11/03/2008 10:36:37 PM PST by wardaddy (I'm as enthusiastic about Obama as my kinfolks were about Reconstruction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: rwilliam

I guess we can let Obama have this place...but that’s it.


62 posted on 11/03/2008 10:48:18 PM PST by MiddleEarth ("The board is set. Pieces are moving. It has come to it at last. The great battle of our time.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Based on the votes from Hart’s Location and Dixville Notch, this is where things stand:

Obama - 32 (64%)
McCain - 16 (32%)
Ron Paul - 2 (4%)

I’m guessing there are a number of pollsters that are upset that they really underestimated Obama’s strength at this point. LOL!

Everyone should head to bed, say a prayer, get lots of sleep, vote and make sure others do the same!

-Bob


63 posted on 11/03/2008 10:49:51 PM PST by rwilliam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pacothecat

Well said! I think the voters in these small towns know that there will be much publicity given to their voting results.

I think, what a lot of people here are overlooking is that this election is different. If little town goes McCain, little town becomes racist by default to all of America. The national publicity and the race factor are what many people are overlooking here.


64 posted on 11/03/2008 10:49:53 PM PST by WildcatClan (The world is full of fatheads; so I invented Diet Shampoo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Balke

Oh no!

I already swallowed my cyanide capsule.


65 posted on 11/03/2008 11:51:23 PM PST by Salamander (http://theuniversalseduction.com/articles/?c=Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: WildcatClan

Harts Location is also in a way PUBLIC voting (its been doing it since 1996). They both had way more votes for Obama than Hillary. Hillary won NH. Its cause they know their vote will be THE FIRST to be shown (Harts Location isnt shown on TV, but theyre released early). So, I would discount these votes. Lets get real, folks. They went for Bob Dole in 1996 and GW Bush in 2004 (2 losses, 1 win, Bush in 2000). The Dixville Notch went for Humphrey in 68 (loss), Ford in 76 (loss), Bush I in 92 (loss), Dole in 96 (loss) and Bush in 04 (loss). Since 1968, Dixville Notch has only picked the winner very few times (Reagan 80, 84, Bush Sr. 88, Nixon 72). Take it for what you will. Heck, even if Mac loses NH, he can still win. NH has been trending Democratic. For it to go for Humphrey in a time when NH was very reliably Republican shows how useless these numbers really are.


66 posted on 11/04/2008 12:03:50 AM PST by MacisBack08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: MacisBack08; WildcatClan

In the 1992 primaries, the Libertarian Party candidate received more votes than Dole or Clinton in Dixville Notch. In the general election, the Libertarian candidate received more than twice the votes as Slick Willie. These publicity-seeking small NH towns are not trend-setters.


67 posted on 11/04/2008 12:48:36 AM PST by peyton randolph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

Oops...meant Bush or Clinton...NOT Dole. ;-)


68 posted on 11/04/2008 12:50:24 AM PST by peyton randolph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Onerom99

69 posted on 11/04/2008 12:54:35 AM PST by Terpfen (To all you knee-jerkers: remember Rick Santorum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: snarkytart

Which means that Kerry should have won. The “Redskins Rule” is, if they lose, the party currently in control of the White House loses the election. Republicans controlled the White House and they won the election.


70 posted on 11/04/2008 1:00:03 AM PST by jutsu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
Your post explains why Hart's Notch went for Obama. People with a vested business interest in wooing customers coming into this hamlet for gay marriages, gay vacations, gay honeymoons and gay "romantic escapes" will vote their pocketbooks.

In this case, Obama, the panderer to gay rights, comes out on top.

Leni

71 posted on 11/04/2008 1:49:12 AM PST by MinuteGal (Today is my FR 10th Anniversary! Anticipating a huge gift tomorrow, Election Day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: MacisBack08

“After a victorious showing in the Iowa caucuses, where votes were cast publicly, polls predicted that Obama would also capture the New Hampshire Democratic primary election by a large margin over Hillary Clinton, a white senator. However, Clinton defeated Obama by three points in the New Hampshire race, where ballots were cast secretly, immediately initiating suggestions by some analysts that the Bradley effect may have been at work.”


72 posted on 11/04/2008 2:00:11 AM PST by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: rwilliam

So has New Hampshire’s motto changed from “Live free or die” to “Give me some pie”?


73 posted on 11/04/2008 2:13:27 AM PST by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Well, there will be lots of blame to go around tomorrow. I don't think most people here realize the depth of the people's anger at, and contempt for, Bush.

It's not the 25% approval that's the real problem. It's what's in the heads of the 75% that's important.

They are willing to see the country destroyed (radically transformed), such is the depth of their anger.

I don't really understand it, but it's all over up here - and I live in a rural small town that went for Bush twice.

74 posted on 11/04/2008 2:29:18 AM PST by Jim Noble (I have read a fiery gospel, writ in burnished rows of steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: WildcatClan
If little town goes McCain, little town becomes racist by default to all of America. The national publicity and the race factor are what many people are overlooking here.

New Hampshire is 98% white, and while we do have crunchy Volvo drivers who care about race, none of them live up in the north woods.

That's just not a factor.

75 posted on 11/04/2008 2:31:40 AM PST by Jim Noble (I have read a fiery gospel, writ in burnished rows of steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

thats not the NH I know...


76 posted on 11/04/2008 3:32:19 AM PST by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

Hart’s Location (pop. 42), opened in 1991. Innkeepers Les Schoof and Edward Butler, together for

So that explains it — the voters are now employees at the Gay Inn.


77 posted on 11/04/2008 4:12:02 AM PST by MDformerDem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Onerom99
We were relying on hope that the polls were missing the rural vote and oversampling Dems.

If the polls weren't oversampling Democrats, the GOP is a in world of trouble no doubt about it.

78 posted on 11/04/2008 4:17:00 AM PST by garbanzo (Government is not the solution to our problems. Government is the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99

Not really. 30 votes in 2000, 31 votes in 2004, 29 votes this year. That’s pretty consistent.


79 posted on 11/04/2008 4:18:07 AM PST by MinnesotaLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rwilliam
Uh, oh - an insurmountable lead for Nappy Nazi in Hart's Location and Dixville Notch.

Has McCain conceded yet?

80 posted on 11/04/2008 5:39:19 AM PST by PermaRag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson