Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wondering What Sarah Palin's Future Holds...
NRO ^ | November 05, 2008 | Jim Geraghty

Posted on 11/05/2008 8:30:19 AM PST by RobinMasters

A few readers have asked whether I think Sarah Palin will run for the Senate in the future. I think that would be a mistake, for several reasons, not the least of which is that, if successful, the decision would take an unique and popular outside-the-beltway executive and put her inside the Beltway as one of 100 legislators voting on every bill that comes down the pike.

For now, I hope Sarah Palin gets to take a vacation and spend some much-deserved time with that beautiful family. Her experience these past four months must have been simultaneously exhilarating, supremely frustrating, and thoroughly exhausting.

I hope Palin runs for a second term as governor and is reelected. This seems like a likely scenario.

(Excerpt) Read more at campaignspot.nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: wk4bush2004
"I think she’ll run for a second term as governor in 2010"

I agree. For here career and family's sake.

"...and then she’ll run for President in 2012. America needs her in the White House!"

I disagree. She should stay in Alaska. Losers never make good candidates in the "run again" thing. Example: George Allen, Rick Santorum, Michael Steele, Pat Toomey, Mike Huckabee, Mitt Romney... all would be losers. There would need to be new blood and dynamic Conservativism. I would add that as the women's vote turned out, that it would also need to be a man...both candidates. Sarah Palin was a star, but more of celebrity stardom than serious contender as was evidenced by 'conservative' men and women's view of her.

21 posted on 11/05/2008 8:43:33 AM PST by KriegerGeist (I'm now considered a "Bitter Clinger" to my guns and religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: loungeSerf
What needs to happen is that Palin be allowed to be herself in the coming primary season.

We on the other hand, must take control of the GOP primary and tell the MSM to "Phak off" when they try to choose our candidate like they did this year.

We really have no one to blame but ourselves.

22 posted on 11/05/2008 8:43:33 AM PST by skimbell (Life, Liberty and the pursuit of all who threaten either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

I agree that she will carry more weight as a governor than as a minority Senator.

Unless the Obama administration implodes before 2012 the Republican challenger will fight a losing battle to unseat him.
It will probably be better for her to plan on 2016.


23 posted on 11/05/2008 8:48:42 AM PST by Iron Munro (Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress; but I repeat myself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

FOX just reported they will be having an Interveiw with Sarah coming up within a few minutes. It’s 11:48 est now.


24 posted on 11/05/2008 8:49:46 AM PST by diverteach (http://foolishpleasurestudio.com/eyewool/slap_hillary.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Governor Palin deserved much better than she got and deserves better than being exiled (politically) back to Alaska. She was without a doubt a true gift from the north, an Aurora Borealis that glimmered in the night sky. She excited the base, invigorated newcomers and taunted the stuffed shirts of the Beltway.


25 posted on 11/05/2008 8:50:16 AM PST by fortunate sun (Proud Palinista!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Harry Wurzbach

It’s awfully hard for her to be on Meet the Press, Face The Nation and This Week if she is in Alaska. London would even work better. She needs to work on some things. Her vocabulary is suspect, for one thing (She kept saying that Obama would “bankruptcy” (sic) the coal industry for example.

She should work out her term in Alaska, and set up trade missions to Europe and South America and Russia.

She needs to visit her troops in Afghanistan and Iraq

Based on this election cycle, she will have to start campaigning full-time.

She needs to write a book about her experiences balancing being a woman, a wife, and a public servant and another book called “Uncle Trig” written from the perspective of Bristol’s baby. (a real tear jerker)

Then she goes on a national book tour.


26 posted on 11/05/2008 8:50:34 AM PST by Soliton (This 2 shall pass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
If Sarah has any future in national Politics, she needs to bone up on topics like national security and economics. Perhaps a group of advisers to get her able to speak on the subject well. She needs to shed the image the press has placed on her, of being out of her league.

Republicans could sure use a well spoken person, with the ability to have instant recall of facts and figures to prove his point. Someone like, Newt I guess.

27 posted on 11/05/2008 8:51:43 AM PST by Paradox (Obama, the Audacity of Hype.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Thank you Governor Palin for fighting the good fight! You’re are the best thing to happen to this party in a long time.


28 posted on 11/05/2008 8:52:05 AM PST by Force12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Sarah Palin should go to Alaska and stay there. This country doesn’t deserve people of her caliber.


29 posted on 11/05/2008 8:52:32 AM PST by Revolting cat! (Everytime they open their mouth they shoot themselves in the foot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

bump


30 posted on 11/05/2008 8:54:21 AM PST by Centurion2000 (To protect and defend ... against all enemies, foreign and domestic .... by any means necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: KriegerGeist
Palin should stay in AK. It's where she can do the most good. The state supports her. If she tries for the Senate, first, it will be a demotion, and, second, there's little a Senator in the minority (probably for our lifetimes) can do, one vote out of a hundred, a minority vote to boot.

We've probably seen the last of Sarah Palin on the national scene. When you're part of a national ticket that gets slaughtered this badly, there's really no where to go. Look at some of the illustrious landslide-losing VPs from the past, William Miller, Sargent Shriver, Dan Quayle, Geraldine Ferraro. Not exactly a Hall of Fame of political winners.

31 posted on 11/05/2008 8:54:53 AM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: snippy_about_it; StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; ...
I agree with this. She should wait, stay Governor and then run for President. No senate seat for her, please.

I agree, snippy! Sarah Palin for President in 2012. Looking forward to hearing a lot more about Gov. Bobby Jindal as well.

32 posted on 11/05/2008 8:57:12 AM PST by nutmeg (Don't blame me... I voted for McCain/Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

she already has national experience. you can’t say nobody has heard of her


33 posted on 11/05/2008 8:57:12 AM PST by ari-freedom (So this is how Liberty dies... with thunderous applause)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

She should run for reelection, continue to be a spokesman for American energy independence and stay out of presidential politics. She has been Qualyed. We need to start over with new candidates, Jindal and Sanford comes to mind, but there are probably others in the wings. As good as Sarah was for the McCain campaign she was not ready for the national stage and was handled horribly. She was rushed to market and is now damaged goods as far as President is concerned. However as a spokesperson for conservative values and as get out the vote person for candidates I think she has a great future.


34 posted on 11/05/2008 9:02:17 AM PST by redangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg
My dream ticket for 2012: Sarah Palin/Glenn Beck! Why? Because leaders who have a true knowledge of our United States’ Constitution, and who live their lives practicing conservative values is what our country needs.
35 posted on 11/05/2008 9:05:50 AM PST by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

“she already has national experience. you can’t say nobody has heard of her”

I agree with you, but that’s the excuse her opposition used and it worked, didn’t it?


36 posted on 11/05/2008 9:06:18 AM PST by AuntB ( "During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: redangus
This is 1976 all over again. We have a socialist President, got more than 50% of votes. He will screw up the economy so bad that people will love Bush years and long for the times back to capitalism. Sarah will be ready with another 4 years of executive experience and unleashed from the MCCain mill around her neck. If she chooses, Jindal, then she can get all the minority Asian votes in NY,NJ,CA and MidWest.
She will be a Reagan with LIPSTICK on.
37 posted on 11/05/2008 9:10:15 AM PST by MooseChic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: redangus
Agree with your analysis. She is now damaged goods as a candidate through no fault of her own. That said, she can be an invaluable tool on the media and banquet circuit as a spokesperson for conservative causes and family values.
38 posted on 11/05/2008 9:14:53 AM PST by buckalfa (confused and bewildered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

I know she’ll be getting a letter from me thanking her for the beautiful display of Grace and my request for her to run in 2012.


39 posted on 11/05/2008 9:15:41 AM PST by feedback doctor (The first female president will be a Conservative Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KriegerGeist
Losers never make good candidates in the "run again" thing.

Ronald Reagan started running in . . . 1968? Then 1972, right? Something like that. He didn't win the nomination until 1976.

But I'm open to the argument that things are different now, maybe because media saturation makes us sick of the non-winning candidate before his time. What do you think?

40 posted on 11/05/2008 9:22:40 AM PST by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson