Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lorianne

I guess I can understand ridership going up with air travel having become such a PITA. I used to take the train from time to time when I was in college, but needed to take combinations of bus and train to get where I needed to go. More recently (well, ten years ago) we took Amtrack from Dallas to Chicago just to do something different when the kids were small.

Considering that it was more expensive than flying, slower than driving, and the services was worse than the post office, I’m afraid I just don’t see the upside of long distance train travel.

Commuter trains in densely populated areas are different, and I have certainly ridden those in New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Atlanta and other places - and would again.


32 posted on 11/05/2008 7:52:16 PM PST by PhatHead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PhatHead

I have never had trouble with Amtrak service. I’ve heard people are rude for some reason in the west, but Northeast is generally good. I’ve been on that many times Balto to CT; also short hops to western MD, but also out to Indiana and most recently Chicago (and WI through connection). Coach and sleeper.

My view is it has virtually none of the cons of car/bus or plane travel and all of the benefits. As yet, anyway.


38 posted on 11/05/2008 8:11:14 PM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson