Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mick

At this point it’s hard for me to get a feel for how quickly and how far zer0 and his enablers plan to move. He has many that have gone along with him so far, but will they stay with him if he begins to implement ideas such as the civilian security force. The one fear I have is now that the socialists having gained control of the executive and legislative branches will in the case of a complete financial implosion institute draconian measures which would make any hope of a free and open election a pipe dream. At that point it would take at least the real possibility of a violent overthrow to restore limited government.

I have a feeling that as a first step state’s rights are going to be tested if and when he attempts to institue this civilian security force. I would only hope that certain governors would at that point draw a line in the sand.


57 posted on 11/07/2008 10:00:57 AM PST by bereanway (Sarah get your gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: bereanway

Many of us share your concerns. The CNSF will certainly be an ignition point. Some federal Law Enforcement may initially present difficulties, but I predict not for very long as their ranks thin.

One important tweak:
“...violent overthrow to restore limited government.”
should read “...violent defense of the U.S. Constitution.”


66 posted on 11/07/2008 11:42:22 AM PST by frog in a pot (Is there a definition of "domestic enemies" as used in federal oaths, or is that just lip service?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson