“I did not beleve and still cannot believe that that sum came from average low income or welfare black supporters, Hollywierd liberals, northeast liberal elites and so-on... I did not beleve and still cannot believe that that sum came from average low income or welfare black supporters,”
Soros and a group of investment bankers have been documented to have met with Obama two years ago to bankroll his roll out. It's not to far to stretch the imagination that they had the connections, money and ability to manage the roll up of oil prices due to speculation. They also had the inside track on the financial sector, the collapse of which quaranteed an Obama win. Soros pulled the money out from under Hillary and even helped finance McCain during the primaries. That way, he got to pick the players in the game.
“I will be my dollars to donuts that now that they have total power, that they are goping to do whatever it takes (I mean whatever, legal, illegal, deadly force) to never again relinquish that power by some mere election in 2010 years or 2012. This will be like Kenya, Rwanda or Uganda now.”
I don't subscribe to this level of fear. An armed society is a polite society. Any attempts toward disarming society is going to be met with massive amounts of resistance. Mr. Obama will likely not choose direct confrontation, but rely on his many “Corps” to indoctrinate instead. Check out his “Office of President Elect” web site. He has proposed “Corps” for just about everything, ala Karl Marx.
"Mr. Obama will likely not choose direct confrontation, but rely on his many “Corps” to indoctrinate instead." I wonder what the increase in Home Schooling & Private Schooling will be in the coming years? And, I know that Home Schooling is something hated and despised by our (Virginia) new Senator Mark Warner. It is also hated by the established madrassa/indoctrination machine of the NEA. I wonder if attempts will be made to outlaw home Schooling or make it so regulated and difficult that people have to give up?
I don't subscribe to this level of fear. An armed society is a polite society. Any attempts toward disarming society is going to be met with massive amounts of resistance. Mr. Obama will likely not choose direct confrontation He's already figured that out.
I was going to quote from change.gov, but they've taken most of the "Agenda" section down. Hmm. Imagine that. The supposed "openess" has already gone by the wayside. But lets see if I can recover it...
Ah, here it is in Yahoo's cache
Address Gun Violence in Cities:
As president, Barack Obama would repeal the Tiahrt Amendment, which restricts the ability of local law enforcement to access important gun trace information, and give police officers across the nation the tools they need to solve gun crimes and fight the illegal arms trade. Obama and Biden also favor commonsense measures that respect the Second Amendment rights of gun owners, while keeping guns away from children and from criminals who shouldn't have them. They support closing the gun show loophole and making guns in this country childproof. They also support making the expired federal Assault Weapons Ban permanent, as such weapons belong on foreign battlefields and not on our streets. We of course know what gun grabbers mean by "commonsense measures" (Disarming as many law abiding citizens as possible of as many types of arms as they can demonize) and "making guns ... childproof" (Making sure they won't work when needed).
BTW, take a look at the "Crime and Law Enforcement" section on the cached page. None of it has anything to do with criminals, and the "law enforcement" part consists of paying for more police, presumable to enforce the "commonsense measures" referenced above.