Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Steele Likely to Seek RNC Leadership Post
Fox News ^ | November 11, 2008 | Bill Sammon

Posted on 11/11/2008 2:05:16 PM PST by St. Louis Conservative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-272 next last
To: St. Louis Conservative; madison10; B Knotts
"However, my job as an American first is to develop a tri-partisan approach to developing solutions for the challenges we face. I use the word tri-partisan to designate the concept of attracting Democrats, Republicans, and independents to solutions that unify most Americans."

If this strategy is to appeal to Democrats and independents (or moderates) then it's a losing strategy. We don't need NO stinking tri-partisanship. We need unified Conservativeship.

Michael Steele is a good conservative, but he can't win in his won state, what makes anyone think he can win nationally...

As for Newt, he is only a conservative when it's convenient

41 posted on 11/11/2008 2:31:48 PM PST by KriegerGeist ("Cry 'Havoc' and let slip the dogs of War on Socialism")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bcsco

Newt nor Fred need to be in charge of anything at this time. Nothing. Zip. Nada. Squat.

They just need to press conservative values at every moment. Radio, TV and articles. And Newt needs to forget global warming BS for the time being.

Michael Steele needs to be named Chairman of the RNC. He set the tone and get the lackluster GOP in order. Hopefully injecting a backbone in the majority that are still in Congress.


42 posted on 11/11/2008 2:33:43 PM PST by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: parksstp

As a fellow resident, I share your concern.


43 posted on 11/11/2008 2:36:41 PM PST by Into the Vortex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: madison10
YES!

NO!
44 posted on 11/11/2008 2:37:15 PM PST by wolf78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

Go Mike GO GO GO!!!!!!


45 posted on 11/11/2008 2:37:15 PM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Federalist

We need to get Rush Limbaugh back doing TV and really pound home some truths to the American public. He ought to reach out to the young people - have a “College Night Reality Show for Politics” - “Man on the Street” type thing to help our young people. Maybe a “broadcast in excellence” with a twist on letting young people come on his show and give them opportunities to learn how to be a broadcaster. Look how many love American Idol and like being in front of a Camera! Sort of “American Politico” - (jeopardy with a twist? Rush as a political Alex TRebeck and college students on to answer political trivia?) Just brainstorming here...WE NEED IT!


46 posted on 11/11/2008 2:39:09 PM PST by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative
WAKE UP, PEOPLE! We don't need Newt. He is part of why we are where we are. Sheesh.
47 posted on 11/11/2008 2:39:21 PM PST by LiberConservative (Typical white guy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnnGora

>>>>>Gingrich has too much baggage and talks a good game, but then tries to play up to Democrats. <<<<<<

This is for the RNC for God’s sake, not for public office.

If you think that Newt should be excommunicated from the GOP and from conservative leadership you are out of your mind.


48 posted on 11/11/2008 2:39:23 PM PST by angkor (Conservatism is not a religious movement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: K-oneTexas
When I wrote Whether Steele is the head of the RNC, or its face in public I didn't mean to imply that Gingrich or Thompson should be the head. I merely meant that Steele would be the perfect "face" of the RNC whether the head or not. Newt and Thompson have something to contribute. But I prefer fresh blood at the head. Someone young, creative, with a true conservative outlook. On first blush, Steele seems to reflect what I'm referring to.
49 posted on 11/11/2008 2:39:34 PM PST by bcsco (Liberals don't understand, it's impossible to pick up a turd-like Obama-by the clean end...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
Republicans kicked butt with Newts "Contract with America".

Not true
In 94 exit polls showed the vast those voting for the GOP never even heard of it

It was Clinton's Gun control- Gays in the Military and Abortion policies that gave the GOP congress
50 posted on 11/11/2008 2:39:44 PM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Dengar01

Toss Judy Baar Topinka while you’re at it.


51 posted on 11/11/2008 2:40:59 PM PST by St. Louis Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

Well, he won a state chairmanship and did the job very well; then he won the lieutenant governorship in a state with a 2 to 1 Democrat registration and did that job so well he was endorsed by the WaPo even though he and Governor Ehrlich were then replaced by a Democrat who came under attach from his own Democrat dominated legislature he was so bad by comparison.


52 posted on 11/11/2008 2:41:19 PM PST by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them, or they like us?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bcsco

I can agree with that.

Fred and Newt ... you chance is over. Please don’t ask to be in charge any more.

Young blood needed.


53 posted on 11/11/2008 2:41:48 PM PST by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: smith288

Hey, Smith288.

I like that video.


54 posted on 11/11/2008 2:42:04 PM PST by FrankCastle214
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: KriegerGeist

You have to look deeper at what Newt means. He is talking about packaging. He says the way to win is by identifying issues on which supermajorities of voters agree with you, and running on those issues.

That doesn’t mean you throw away your principles; it means you concentrate on the obvious stuff.


55 posted on 11/11/2008 2:44:38 PM PST by B Knotts (ConservatismCentral.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

Newt would be ideal to lead the RNC.

We have got to get back to the operational requirements and benefits of day-to-day conservatism, and away from big government social and moral diktat.


56 posted on 11/11/2008 2:45:44 PM PST by angkor (Conservatism is not a religious movement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: K-oneTexas

Fred turned down the option of running for the post. I wouldn’t mind him, at least fundamentally he remains an unapologetic conservative who can articulate the reasons why. And he does have some experience in building a stronger party. He needs to remain involved. I’ve no objection to Steele, he should have been the choice in ‘06 but Bush though pandering with a selection of Mel Martinez was the way to go.

My objection to Newt isn’t age related. It’s due to that liberal tripe coming out of his mouth the last four years. The message disqualifies him in my eyes.


57 posted on 11/11/2008 2:46:29 PM PST by Soul Seeker (Gov. Sarah Palin '08 -- President Sarah Palin '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
Is he pro-second amendment?

Yeah.

58 posted on 11/11/2008 2:46:54 PM PST by smith288 (Obamunism! Http://www.cafepress.com/smith288)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
"You have to look deeper at what Newt means." Um, this wasn't Newt speaking... It was Michael Steele's quote from FOX I inserted.
59 posted on 11/11/2008 2:48:55 PM PST by KriegerGeist ("Cry 'Havoc' and let slip the dogs of War on Socialism")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

Why is Newt out? Why should we be excited about Steele?


60 posted on 11/11/2008 2:49:04 PM PST by americanophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-272 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson