Died of lead poisoning...
Posted on 11/12/2008 9:06:27 AM PST by 3AngelaD
EDINBURG -- The clerk warned Alejandro Salinas about the suspicious men who had been hanging out in front of the convenience store for the past hour. He told Salinas to be careful as he went back out to his Chevrolet Z-71 pickup truck, that he had just filled at the Aziz Convenience Store about 11 a.m. Saturday.
Salinas walked out to his truck and hopped in. But before he could close the door, 18-year-old Hector Severo Ramos was holding a .25-caliber pistol at Salinas' neck, said Hidalgo County Sheriff Lupe Treviño.
"He says ‘Get out of the truck. I'm going to take it and I'm going to kill you," Treviño said of Ramos.
Salinas told the gunman to calm down; they could work things out. Then he pushed Ramos' pistol away, pulled out his own pistol and fired two 9 mm bullets into Ramos' chest....Three men who were with Ramos took off from the convenience store at Texas Highway 107 and Alamo Road in a brown Chevrolet Impala, deputies said....
Salinas had a license to carry a concealed firearm and a clean criminal record, Treviño said....
Meanwhile, the sheriff said he would likely not pursue criminal charges against Salinas..."This is not a murder," Treviño said. "This is a justifiable homicide."
(Excerpt) Read more at themonitor.com ...
OutFReepingstanding!
In the old days, it was called killing a man who needed killing.
This seems to be dependent on state law. I know it was effectively used in Arizona. I'm now living in California and I don't think the law exists. Obviously apparent results....
I’m pissed about the others that got away!
9mm did the job, but had a couple of 230 gr HP 45 ACPs impacting, the perp would have been launched landing some feet safely away from the lawful citizen.
The mode of death was not homicide, justifiable or otherwise. It was suicide by car owner. The perp could have stopped the chain of events that led to his death at any time up when the trigger was squeezed. Mr Salinas was given no choice in the matter except his laudable decision to live.
It is indeed dependent on state law. Michigan used to have such a law, but sadly it was changed in the never ending quest to protect the criminal class from the evil citizens.
Texas Penal Code Sec. 7.02. CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONDUCT OF ANOTHER.
(a) A person is criminally responsible for an offense committed by the conduct of another if:
(1) acting with the kind of culpability required for the offense, he causes or aids an innocent or nonresponsible person to engage in conduct prohibited by the definition of the offense;
(2) acting with intent to promote or assist the commission of the offense, he solicits, encourages, directs, aids, or attempts to aid the other person to commit the offense; or
(3) having a legal duty to prevent commission of the offense and acting with intent to promote or assist its commission, he fails to make a reasonable effort to prevent commission of the offense.
(b) If, in the attempt to carry out a conspiracy to commit one felony, another felony is committed by one of the conspirators, all conspirators are guilty of the felony actually committed, though having no intent to commit it, if the offense was committed in furtherance of the unlawful purpose and was one that should have been anticipated as a result of the carrying out of the conspiracy.
We still don't care for criminals in Texas.
Died of lead poisoning...
You might want to have a conversation with Isaac Newton.
It (the shooting by the truck owner) wasn’t an act in furtherance of a conspiracy, and it wasn’t a crime. If one of the miscreants had killed somebody while hijacking the truck, then all the conspirators could have been found guilty of it (which is different than when I took Criminal Law at St MU back in the early 80s - thanks for the update).
So AB, what would Newton have to say? I say the perp would be knocked back away. Only the Warren Commission seems to think a round hitting from behind causes the recieving party to move toward the shooter.
You obviously think catching a brick at a couple of hundred feet per second wouldn’t include you in the brick’s momentum?
Your assumption must have the 45 ACPs passing on through and not transferring their energy onto the mass, othewrwise just wanting to be argumentive.
Now: First of all, Mr Newton would tell you that P=mV. Second, he would tell you that momentum is conserved in all interactions. Recall that velocity and momentum are vector quantities; they can have a negative value. Positive or negative value indicates direction.
Two interactons are relevant: First is the interaction of the bullet with the shooter's body (including the pistol). Second is the interaction of the bullet with the perp's body. I shall assume, for simplicity's sake, that at the moment of firing the shooter is not moving, that at the moment of impact the perp is not moving, and that the bullet loses no velocity during its brief movement from muzzle to perp.
Definition of terms:
Ms = Mass of shooter.
Mp = Mass of perp.
Mb = Mass of bullet.
Ps = Momentum of shooter (after shot).
Pp = Momentum of perp (After impact).
Pb = Momentum of bullet (during flight).
Vs = Velocity of shooter (after shot).
Vp = Velocity of perp (After impact).
Vb = Velocity of bullet (during flight).
Prior to the shot,
Ps = Pb = 0.
At the shot (when bullet leaves muzzle),
Ps + Pb = 0 (momentum is conserved)
Ps = -Pb.
MsVs = MbVb
Now, this is all the momentum that bullet will ever have. The interaction of the bullet striking the perp is called an "inelastic collision"; the bullet is completely merged with the perp. Momentum is still conserved. Recall that the perp is stationary prior to impact, therefor his momentum prior to impact Pp is zero.
Pb + Pp = Pbp.
MbVb + 0 = (Mb+Mp)Vpb
So: The momentum of the perp with a bullet in his gut is the same as the momentum of the bullet prior to impact, and in the same direction. It is also equal in magnitude to the momentum of the shooter after the shot, but in opposite direction. If the perp and shooter are the same mass, then they will have the same velocity (actually perp velocity is slightly LESS ... he's got a bullet in his gut and therefore greater mass) but in opposite directions. Since firing a .45ACP pistol (or even a 12ga slug) does not throw me back several feet, it will not do that to the perp. Let's throw some real numbers in here.
Bullet = 230gr or 0.033lb at 950 ft/s. Perp = 200lb. Pb = 0.033 * 950 = 31.35 ft-lb/s
Since momentum is conserved,
Pbp = (200lb + .033lb)Vbp = 31.35 ft-lb/s
Doing some algebra,
Vbp = 31.35/200.033 = 0.157 ft/s
Sorry, perp ain't flying back two or three (or even one) feet due to being shot with a .45ACP. In fact, most of his motion after the shot will be due to physiological reactions and gravity. The bullet's momentum is negligible in comparison. Also, when you shoot the .45, you will be given a (backward) velocity of 0.157 ft/s (it's called recoil). That "feels" right to me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.