Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sheriff: Attempted carjacker gets shot
McAllen Monitor ^ | November 10, 2008 | Jared Taylor

Posted on 11/12/2008 9:06:27 AM PST by 3AngelaD

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: 3AngelaD

OutFReepingstanding!


41 posted on 11/12/2008 10:08:12 AM PST by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
I think he called it "praiseworthy homicide".

In the old days, it was called killing a man who needed killing.

42 posted on 11/12/2008 10:19:58 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: A_Tradition_Continues
Since there was a death involved in the attempted carjacking the 3 accomplices can be charge with homicide.

This seems to be dependent on state law. I know it was effectively used in Arizona. I'm now living in California and I don't think the law exists. Obviously apparent results....

43 posted on 11/12/2008 10:37:56 AM PST by XHogPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

I’m pissed about the others that got away!


44 posted on 11/12/2008 10:48:59 AM PST by Ammo Republic 15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BJClinton

9mm did the job, but had a couple of 230 gr HP 45 ACPs impacting, the perp would have been launched landing some feet safely away from the lawful citizen.


45 posted on 11/12/2008 10:52:44 AM PST by dusttoyou (First they steal our savings, then our liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Old Grumpy

The mode of death was not homicide, justifiable or otherwise. It was suicide by car owner. The perp could have stopped the chain of events that led to his death at any time up when the trigger was squeezed. Mr Salinas was given no choice in the matter except his laudable decision to live.


46 posted on 11/12/2008 11:18:40 AM PST by magslinger (If you take my gun from me, mind the barrel. It will be hot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: XHogPilot
This seems to be dependent on state law. I know it was effectively used in Arizona. I'm now living in California and I don't think the law exists. Obviously apparent results....

It is indeed dependent on state law. Michigan used to have such a law, but sadly it was changed in the never ending quest to protect the criminal class from the evil citizens.

47 posted on 11/12/2008 11:26:18 AM PST by magslinger (If you take my gun from me, mind the barrel. It will be hot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: jagusafr
Not so.

Texas Penal Code Sec. 7.02. CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONDUCT OF ANOTHER.

(a) A person is criminally responsible for an offense committed by the conduct of another if:

(1) acting with the kind of culpability required for the offense, he causes or aids an innocent or nonresponsible person to engage in conduct prohibited by the definition of the offense;

(2) acting with intent to promote or assist the commission of the offense, he solicits, encourages, directs, aids, or attempts to aid the other person to commit the offense; or

(3) having a legal duty to prevent commission of the offense and acting with intent to promote or assist its commission, he fails to make a reasonable effort to prevent commission of the offense.

(b) If, in the attempt to carry out a conspiracy to commit one felony, another felony is committed by one of the conspirators, all conspirators are guilty of the felony actually committed, though having no intent to commit it, if the offense was committed in furtherance of the unlawful purpose and was one that should have been anticipated as a result of the carrying out of the conspiracy.

We still don't care for criminals in Texas.

48 posted on 11/12/2008 11:33:59 AM PST by UNscared (my Messiah doesn't need a national security force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
DEAD Died of lead poisoning...
49 posted on 11/12/2008 11:34:25 AM PST by odin2008 (EVIL TRUMPHS WHEN GOOD MEN DO NOTHING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dusttoyou

You might want to have a conversation with Isaac Newton.


50 posted on 11/12/2008 11:37:26 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: UNscared

It (the shooting by the truck owner) wasn’t an act in furtherance of a conspiracy, and it wasn’t a crime. If one of the miscreants had killed somebody while hijacking the truck, then all the conspirators could have been found guilty of it (which is different than when I took Criminal Law at St MU back in the early 80s - thanks for the update).


51 posted on 11/12/2008 12:21:02 PM PST by jagusafr ("Bugs, Mr. Rico! Zillions of 'em!" - Robert Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

So AB, what would Newton have to say? I say the perp would be knocked back away. Only the Warren Commission seems to think a round hitting from behind causes the recieving party to move toward the shooter.
You obviously think catching a brick at a couple of hundred feet per second wouldn’t include you in the brick’s momentum?
Your assumption must have the 45 ACPs passing on through and not transferring their energy onto the mass, othewrwise just wanting to be argumentive.


52 posted on 11/12/2008 9:24:46 PM PST by dusttoyou (First they steal our savings, then our liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: dusttoyou
First, I'm assuming that the bullet is stopped entirely within the perp's body. While this is not guaranteed, it is also not improbably with modern JHP at <1000 ft/s.

Now: First of all, Mr Newton would tell you that P=mV. Second, he would tell you that momentum is conserved in all interactions. Recall that velocity and momentum are vector quantities; they can have a negative value. Positive or negative value indicates direction.

Two interactons are relevant: First is the interaction of the bullet with the shooter's body (including the pistol). Second is the interaction of the bullet with the perp's body. I shall assume, for simplicity's sake, that at the moment of firing the shooter is not moving, that at the moment of impact the perp is not moving, and that the bullet loses no velocity during its brief movement from muzzle to perp.

Definition of terms:

Ms = Mass of shooter.
Mp = Mass of perp.
Mb = Mass of bullet.

Ps = Momentum of shooter (after shot).
Pp = Momentum of perp (After impact).
Pb = Momentum of bullet (during flight).

Vs = Velocity of shooter (after shot).
Vp = Velocity of perp (After impact).
Vb = Velocity of bullet (during flight).

Prior to the shot,
Ps = Pb = 0.

At the shot (when bullet leaves muzzle),
Ps + Pb = 0 (momentum is conserved)
Ps = -Pb.
MsVs = MbVb

Now, this is all the momentum that bullet will ever have. The interaction of the bullet striking the perp is called an "inelastic collision"; the bullet is completely merged with the perp. Momentum is still conserved. Recall that the perp is stationary prior to impact, therefor his momentum prior to impact Pp is zero.

Pb + Pp = Pbp.
MbVb + 0 = (Mb+Mp)Vpb

So: The momentum of the perp with a bullet in his gut is the same as the momentum of the bullet prior to impact, and in the same direction. It is also equal in magnitude to the momentum of the shooter after the shot, but in opposite direction. If the perp and shooter are the same mass, then they will have the same velocity (actually perp velocity is slightly LESS ... he's got a bullet in his gut and therefore greater mass) but in opposite directions. Since firing a .45ACP pistol (or even a 12ga slug) does not throw me back several feet, it will not do that to the perp. Let's throw some real numbers in here.

Bullet = 230gr or 0.033lb at 950 ft/s. Perp = 200lb. Pb = 0.033 * 950 = 31.35 ft-lb/s
Since momentum is conserved,
Pbp = (200lb + .033lb)Vbp = 31.35 ft-lb/s
Doing some algebra,
Vbp = 31.35/200.033 = 0.157 ft/s

Sorry, perp ain't flying back two or three (or even one) feet due to being shot with a .45ACP. In fact, most of his motion after the shot will be due to physiological reactions and gravity. The bullet's momentum is negligible in comparison. Also, when you shoot the .45, you will be given a (backward) velocity of 0.157 ft/s (it's called recoil). That "feels" right to me.

53 posted on 11/13/2008 5:39:44 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson