Posted on 11/17/2008 11:46:23 AM PST by mgist
The original birth certificate of anyone running for public office should be released.
Please elaborate.
When would this occur?
If you have a sworn in President I seriously doubt that the National Command Authority could simply stop acknowledging him as President before he was removed from office or resigned.
I think it would take more than simply having incontrovertible proof that Obama was not a citizen.
I think it would take removal from office by the Senate after he is sworn in. I don’t think even the SCOTUS could remove him after inauguration.
The real question is, given the heavily weighted extreme left democrat senate; Would the SENATE remove him from office after inauguration?
Stanley Anne Dunham has been dead for quite some time. I doubt she will be filing a challenge any time soon.
I go through it all the time...I’ve done two DSS Agent interviews and one written USOPM inquiry within the last two weeks for our employees.
Not a chance, naturalization is a completely different process. It appears he was born in Hawaii which means he is a US citizen. But there is something else there that will prove embarrassing.
The most likely is that he changed his name at some point to sound more ethnic. Another possibility is that his father is not who we were led to believe. At any rate I have no idea what he is hiding or why.
She does not need to.
Someone requesting access to medical records either has to supply a release form signed by the individual whose record are requested or a court order releasing those records.
Medical privacy laws have pretty severe penalties for those who do not keep medical records secure and private.
Considering that S. Anne Dunham is dead her next of kin would need to sign for release of her records. I don’t see that happening. So that leaves a court order. When did that happen?
I doubt a court order happened. People are bribed, documents change hands.
So, who’re you going to prosecute? The people hiding facts and forgind documents in a RICO tainted conspiracy to hide the ineligibility of a President Elect, or some clerk who wants the truth made known.
If they don't, it's pretty much a de facto / de jure acknowledgement that the Constitution is a silly piece of paper instead of our foundation of government.
Which them opens up all kind of interesting (chinese connotation) possibilities for the states.
Hugh is beginning to nauseate me. This legal mumbo jumbo about there is no remedy for the clear violation of the Constitution tells me our legal system is totally down the tubes. Of course there is a remedy, if there is any logic left in the system. He simply did not win on Nov 4th because he was eligible for the office. And, the judges can refuse to administer the oath of office to him and they can make it clear in writing that he has no right to the office.
“because he was not eligible”
I just went thru transcripts of all 3 Senate debates (taken from Keyes own website). No such conversation in any of the 3 debates.......
Agreed, though it would be easier to get records from a dead person's records than a living person's.
well that’s great-—why have a constitution at all if you’re not going to follow it????????
Leftists don’t respect rules, they look at outcomes.
If the outcomes aren’t what they want, they ignore the rules or get some judge to change them.
you know...it’s funny...i was driving around the other day and saw some lib with a bumper sticker that said
“Annoy a conservative...Defend the Constitution...”
i had to laugh out loud but isn’t it interesting if this whole conspiracy turns out to be true...
i just don’t see how people could be ok with this...maybe i’m just naive...
Before he takes office. I suspect the Constitution assumes vetting before being swornin.
An elector should be part of the suit (necessarily a McCain Elector). If a member of the Electoral College does not have standing, then NOBODY does.
Why did Senator Obama say half of the things that we have him on record as saying? Because he is “The One” that we have been waiting for to come and save America from itself!
At this point, he could admit to being a foreigner and most of those that support him would suggest (just as he did) that the Constitution is just old and useless and we have grown beyond that document’s constraints! You know, all those “negative rights!”
If it was not for newly created “positive rights” like civil rights legislation and the AD Act, etc... we wouldn’t have half the people in America thinking that every group should have their own “rights” listed in the Constitution! After all, even though I fall under the AD Act, I have no other specific positive rights listed in the constitution for white males; we need to correct this NOW!
Um, have you been watching Congress for the past few decades? To a democrat Marxist; oaths are just lip service. Part of a ritual they have to go through to obtain what they covet - POWER.
They don't give a damn about the Constitution or The People it is meant to protect.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.