Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Chet 99

The Huckster is more responsible for the nomination of McCain than anyone. He came from nowhere out of Iowa with a head of steam that took all the more conservative candidates out, leaving McCain. I am not saying the Huckster was not a good candidate, but, the perception was that he was a clown and not a serious presidential candidate, more a Pat Paulson than a Lincoln.


80 posted on 11/17/2008 1:00:13 PM PST by depressed in 06 (What will you do for America's last Thanksgiving?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: depressed in 06

“I am not saying the Huckster was not a good candidate,”

That’s okay, I’m saying the Huckster was not a good candidate! :0)


104 posted on 11/17/2008 1:24:10 PM PST by RooRoobird20 (1/20/2013: "Change We Can Believe In")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

To: depressed in 06

From the exit polls in the primaries, when asked who they would have voted for had Huckabee not been in the race, the vast majority responded with McCain. This does not support the “stalking horse for McCain” theory. I was 100% for Fred, but I don’t think he could have parlayed a SC win into enough to stop McCain this year. The aisle-crosser got too much momentum from the open primaries.


133 posted on 11/17/2008 1:54:28 PM PST by Ingtar (For the first time in my adult life, I am NOT proud of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson