Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OnTheDress

Stevens had no shot of going back to the Senate, regardless of the outcome of this election. What you’re all cheering is the absolute certainty that he’ll be replaced with a democrat.

This election had nothing to do with Ted Stevens. It was about having the chance to retain the seat.


27 posted on 11/18/2008 6:46:38 PM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard

Winning with turds like Stevens is not winning. Winning like that is, well, like WhistlingPastTheGraveyard.

Look, there is nothing in the Constitution that prohibits another revolution.


39 posted on 11/18/2008 7:04:44 PM PST by Cyber Ninja (His legacy is a stain on the dress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard

Incredibly good point. My apologies for chiming in before giving it due thought.


70 posted on 11/18/2008 8:32:58 PM PST by Marne Dawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson