Posted on 11/29/2008 6:53:30 AM PST by knighthawk
With the U.S. economy in crisis, George W. Bush’s already slumping popularity levels have sagged even deeper. This summer, his own political party kept him away from its national convention in St. Paul. The President himself has been reduced to wistful hopes that history will somehow justify him.
At this low point, some counterbalance:
1) Even as you read this, Indian commandos are waging a deadly urban battle against Islamic terrorists. Those soldiers have almost certainly trained with U.S. Rangers or Marines — part of an intensifying U.S.-India security partnership that has been one of the most signal foreign policy successes of the Bush years. Otto von Bismark is supposed to have said that the most important geopolitical fact of the 20th century would be that the United States and Great Britain spoke the same language. Bush’s strategic entente with India may well prove the most important geopolitical fact of the 21st.
(Excerpt) Read more at network.nationalpost.com ...
Dittos. How some Freepers can still drink from the Bush/Rove kool-aid jug and ignore the utter disaster to Reagan Conservatism Bush-43 is leaving behind is appalling.
“Did you actually read the article? Frum isn’t writing for you or me or his lib friends. He’s writing for history”
You are apparently not aware that Frum is persona non gratis due to his opportunistic trashing of Sarah Palin during the campaign.
I read the article. As usual, his insights are pedestrian.
Did you know Frum is Canadian?
So you think we should go into Afghanistan and straighten things out? What a great idea. I wonder when we’ll think of that?
What’s that you say? We’re already there? In fact we went there long before Iraq? What a concept.
/s
Tell that to the thousands of Americans victimized by illegal alien crime and violence each year after 9/11.
” I think Iraq was unnecessary”
Iraq was Bush I’s problem to solve. Your vote for Perot gave that job to Clinton. Clinton refused to do anything because he was beholden to Soros who apparently had an inside straight to Sadaam’s oil money. This was in spite of Iraqs involvment in the first World Trade Center bombing.
Then, please recall, the stationing of our troups in Saudi was the primary reason that Bin Laden gave for 9/11.
If the regime change had not been done, pressure from Germany, France, Russia, our leftests, etc would have ended sanctions & Sadaam would likely have the bomb now. Fortunately for us most of his atomic weapons program has likely joined any number of unknown antiquities in the Iraqi desert.
Right you are. Never have I seen any one person so venemously attacked, so hated for no reason as this man.
As soon as I saw who his foaming-at-the-mouth enemies were, I knew he was doing something right. I read a fair bit about him and came to admire him greatly.
Even if I am the last person on earth saying it, he is a good and decent man and deserves much respect.
Thank you, Judy. You are very much correct and I agree.
LMAO! That is the stragy, I suppose.
Do nothing?
They did plenty.
Too much IMHO.
But you must admit, he did ruined the Republican Party.
/s
Bush has fought the so-called War On Terror on the one hand, while on the other he’s tried mightily to erect yet another islamist state...in Israel no less.
For all his successes, such monumental idiocy deflects most of his achievment.
Disagree with the personal aspect of US targets in the Middle East. Saddam was the biggest out of control player. And the word in the Administration was who says he’s the last.
That was early on when we were making despots worry and Kadafi himself was shaking in Libya thinking that he was next on the target list.
In that regard, Libya was nothing to Saddam who had bribed the international league of immoral nations and was beginning the campaign to have sanctions lifted entirely.
Kay has completed his report and acknowledged that Saddam had all the components of his WMD program in place and would need very little time to kick it in gear.
The world would have looked very different in 2004 or 2005 if Saddam had remained in power. People tend to overlook that. The US had no support as the French and the Germans were sufficiently in the tank to allow Saddam to reconstitute his arms. Russia and China would have been happy as well with shipments ready to go for the petrol dollars.
The whole Bush Administration wanted Saddam out as they saw him as the biggest destabilizing influence in the region. There was not even the knowledge at that time of the ties to Al Qaeda that went back to the early 90s.
And need I remind you that here in New York, Iraq was the only nation that refused to lower their flags to half mast after 9-11.
Yes - that’s what it’s all about.
You can have, say, a president-elect call himself a Christian (except when he accidentally refers to his Muslim faith) and nobody is bothered. Why is that? Could it be that they know full-well he isn’t?
Talk is cheap and actions speak louder than words. Obama says very clearly how non-Christian he is by his pro-abortion position. The left knows full well that there are certain things he must say to get elected, and being “Christian” is one of them. He is, however, one of theirs - talks the talk but doesn’t walk the walk.
President Bush was a Christian by actions and that is what they hated him for.
“you think we should go into Afghanistan and straighten things out?”
I have spoken with several people who have been there. I haven’t, but know its reputation is the ‘death of empires.’
I am increasingly content with how we have handled Afghanistan, as the Alq types ride in and run away like fighters in Monty Python movies, or they hide in those hills. If OBL is holed up in some cave or hut somewhere on the border, or moves around with his dialysis equipment, he is contained. That we don’t see him at all tells us something, now, doesn’t it.
The old tradition of the last Abbasid caliph going down to the basement and never coming back up, or of the hidden imam, or of the mystical martyr, Hussein (in the religion, not Saddam), goes way back in this culture. OBL’s value going forward is now part of that myth and love of legend, sort of like the myth of the ‘Palestine’ as an actual lineage and birthright—when the word was coined on a map by Hadrian (?) as an insult to Judea and the Jews.
by this culture, I meant ME culture.
So, I left an “e” off the end of a word. Big deal. Didn’t your momma tell you that nitpicking is the sign of a pissant?
The missing "e" was just a typo or a minor misspelling. The use of the language problem was the use of "wrap" instead of "rap." I'm not sure if that's nitpicking - I decided to consult the true pissant to have an expert make the call.
I would say I'm mostly in agreement with your list. I would add that he signed McCain-Feingold and trusted the court to find it unconstitutional instead of vetoing like he should have. (You might have considered that covered by #5.)
I do believe Iraq was necessary, but we were to determined to play nice and rebuild before we were done breaking things. Bush likes to claim he brought freedom to millions, but the new Iraq is even less tolerant of religious minorities than the old Iraq. (Democracy isn't freedom, it's the tyranny or the majority.) We should have insisted on a constitutional republic that respected religious minorities. We also should have been taking reimbursement for our efforts out of their oil money.
Bump to the top.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.