Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BlessedBeGod
It was my understanding that the SC is not being asked to rule him ineligible, but rather to rule that candidates must show their birth certificates/proof of being natural born citizens. It would be Obama not the SC that showed he was ineligible by being unable to show the proof. But since this would be a ruling that covered all candidates it could not be said to target only him.
10 posted on 11/29/2008 8:49:39 AM PST by nclaurel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: nclaurel

Yes, and I think it would be a rather useful thing.

‘Cept in ‘Bama’s case, my bet is that he would haul out DNA evidence to prove he’s not actually an Obama by blood anyway, explaining that he was some AA US citizen’s spawn—and therefore a natural-born citizen. (As a capper, he’d use the pride and coverup of his dead grandmother as an excuse not to have come clean earlier.)


36 posted on 11/29/2008 10:38:08 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson