Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: eyedigress
“As a jurist on SCOTUS would you say that a direct violation of the Constitution would apply here? “

Sadly I do not think anyone who thinks their rights under the Constitution have been infringed will have their case allowed before SCOTUS.

My wife has what she and an attorney think she has a discrimination case against her HOA. The attorney said she can spend the money and try it her self and be tied up in legal roadblocks forever.

She can use an attorney and he will take it as far as her money will last.

So it does not matter that she has a case because not in her lifetime or limit of her funds will she see a date before SCOTUS.

She will die tired, broke, and aggrieved and never talk to even a clerk at SCOTUS.

332 posted on 12/02/2008 11:13:32 PM PST by JSteff (It was ALL about SCOTUS. Most forget about that and may have doomed us for a generation or more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies ]


To: JSteff
“As a jurist on SCOTUS would you say that a direct violation of the Constitution would apply here? “

I am talking about the legality of becoming President. As far as a home owners association I suggest that falls under different jurisdiction.

342 posted on 12/02/2008 11:21:48 PM PST by eyedigress (All I want for Christmas is a nice blue barrel rifle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson