I beleive there is a lot more case law regarding citizenship status “natural born” or otherwise than we are aware of. Hopefully the SC will use it.
There is a ton of precedent. The question will be how any reviewing court would assess its relevance to this specific fact pattern.
That said, this is exactly why I am okay with jawboning about the law, but not okay (for me personally) with proclaiming any conclusion on this case. There are so many potential legal issues, never mind the incredibly convoluted factual issues should any court determine it was necessary to do more than review the regularity of a birth certificate.